Windows Vista Security at 180 Days

re: Windows Vista Security at 180 Days

Hij — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 18:17:53 GMT

Hey did you remember to strip out the NSAKEY comments from the Windows Vista source code?

re: Windows Vista Security at 180 Days

newscientist2000 — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:32:55 GMT

There is definately some good news out there

http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201

Windows Vista Security

Paul Mooney — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:48:14 GMT

Windows Vista Security at 180 Days Windows Vista just passed the 180 day mark since it was deployed...

re: Windows Vista Security at 180 Days

newscientist2000 — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:41:41 GMT

Security in Vista is definately improved over XP, however there will always be some security holes like this one

http://www.msblog.org/index.php/2007/06/16/vista-recovery-command-prompt/

With regard to this problem, are there any plans to change the new Vista DVDs that will be pressed in the future to disable the feature above, or is it not seen as a major security problem because once you have given physical access to a machine your really fighting a losing the battle anyway?

Is Microsoft's main security focus on stopping remote off site attacks on Windows based machines?

I personally cant wait for you guys to get the Trusted Platform Module Stuff you built into the CPUs working for the whole OS not just Bitlocker Encryption. A lot of people working in big Pharma and Biotech need to have there whole IT systems really, really locked down and the Trusted Platform initiative could really help. There is a real need for stopping any unsigned code running on your machine at the hardware level, and a need for a ultra super secure Windows. Vista and Bitlocker are definately the way forward, hopefully Windows will continue to become more secure.

How vulnerable is Vista after 180 days? | ITsVISTA

How vulnerable is Vista after 180 days? | ITsVISTA — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:54:30 GMT

PingBack from http://itsvista.com/2007/06/how-vulnerable-is-vista-after-180-days/