Welcome to The Windows Blog 


Windows Vista: A better investment for your investments

Interesting article in USA Today from Matt Krantz, the publication's financial markets reporter and an expert on online investing. Matt offers up an unbiased answer to a reader's question: What's a better computer for online investing, a PC or a Mac?

Not surprisingly, Krantz advises that Windows Vista PCs  win "hands-down" over Macs for things like better software compatibility, better community support, IE and greater user productivity. And his fundamental point on cost should hit home for anyone (not just online investors) in the market for a new computer:

...For less than $500, you can buy a Compaq Presario CQ50Z laptop. It comes with a 1.9 GHz dual-core processor, 1 gigabyte of memory, an Nvidia GeForce graphics card, 120 gigabyte harddrive and wireless networking. A capable machine by today's standards and more than adequate for an online investor, for less than $500.

Now, let's see what's available from Apple. You'll need to spend at least $1,099 for a MacBook, which comes with the same memory and hard drive. The MacBook has a slightly faster microprocessor, 2.1 GHz, but you won't notice the difference if you're just Web surfing.

In this case, you save $600 that could be invested in stocks instead of sent to Cupertino...

For most people, a 156% price mark-up is too steep for admission to the club (and most people don't buy computers to join clubs anyway). Picking a Windows Vista PC over a Mac is no-brainer for business customers in particular - it's a smarter use of resources, offers hardware choice (something sorely lacking with Macs), and flexibility to use whichever applications make the most sense.


Comments

  1. Posted on: August 21, 2008 at 7:41PM  

    You can totally justify Windows Vista for being cheap but Windows Vista is a total crap. I just don't get it. How can microsoft just force their will on us to use Windows Vista? When I went to dell web site to order a system I don't have an option to choose Windows XP. I use vista in my office and I hate it. Why does microsoft need to change the UI everytime they release a windows OS or any product? The best part is you will have an option to revert to "Classic" :-) First of all, Windows Vista is slow and visual studio performs better on XP and Server 2003.

    I can understand those aero look for home users or blondes who buy mac just because apple has it in PINK. But, what about developers I don't want to deal with those sleek tab or color at the cost of performance.

    If you guys can build windows server 2003 and 2008 may be microsoft can just wrap it by disabling some of the server features and sell it as a windows 2009 OS for professional.

    Windows vista is a total waste for software developers

  2. Posted on: August 21, 2008 at 7:42PM  

    Vista on 1 GB of RAM is possible, but not fantastic... The extra gig should only bring that machine up by about $50, but I can't recommend anything less than 2 for a Vista user. I love Vista, don't get me wrong -- I just want everyone else to have a good experience with it, too. :)

  3. Posted on: August 21, 2008 at 10:26PM  

    I agree with jrronimo - a minimum of 2gbs of RAM.

    kristin is on crack - Vista is a superior product to XP on every level. sure when it came out there were problems, but look at internet history the same problems came up when xp was released. The difference now is that the Internet is used everywhere so everyone is reading the hype and xp is a solid operating system so there is less incentive to move.

    Anyhow I use vista 64bit on one of my desktops and one of my laptops - my other desktop and other laptop have xp. I'm much happier working on Vista and I'm a power user.

    Multiple programs (photoshop CS3, Illustrator CS3, word, publisher) streaming radio and more at the same time. Vista kicks butt.

  4. Posted on: August 22, 2008 at 12:28AM  

    Hmm nothing about Linux?  I'm guessing because it will always manage to be cheaper than Windows. :P  Although Windows ties when you consider PC distributor bundle dealies... IE they get paid to preload tons of useless apps to offset the $50 or whatever price.

    I don't think your average Windows user would gain $50 or whatever those bundled Windows' cost for switching to Linux (maybe the street prices of $200-$400 would be different) but Linux is getting better at the whole "just works" thing.  Might change.

  5. Posted on: August 22, 2008 at 12:53AM  

    Vista SP1 is fine. Some people complain about an avalanche of bugs, but most of them cannot name just one bug; they just parrot what they heard to look smart and "in". Those who can name specific bugs, either mention minor stuff or refer to questionable benchmarks. Give me a break.

  6. Posted on: August 22, 2008 at 2:10AM  

    Well I have been using Vista for a year no issue's. I running Windows Vista Business SP 1 on a AMD 64 4800 Dual Coer PC with Cosair XMS 2 800mhz 3 GIG memory with a NVIDA 8600 GT 1GIG

    I work with XP all day and suffer through freezing and poor network performance. I work in IT so I can tell you honestly Vista is superior to XP.

    Problem is idiots think they can continue to run legacy software and hardware on a new OS. Look folks when Window 2000 came out people were mad that they could not use there 3.11 pc anymore. The same goes with Vista time to move on the PC this is a good OS and please about Linux well I have used Ubuntu and it destroys hard drives look at their bug report they are still having problems with power management.

    So folks give a Vista a chance.

  7. Posted on: August 22, 2008 at 5:11AM  

    This is my experience

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXS-BfTGn7g

    Great Vista Sp1

  8. Posted on: August 22, 2008 at 8:11AM  

    Amazing ... PC hardware is cheaper than Mac hardware! It must be because of the operating system installed on it, right? Thanks, Microsoft!

    Do you realize how pathetic this makes you look? First "Mojave," now this. How about acknowledging Vista's ugly spots, and making steps toward fixing them? Like the IE team does?

  9. Posted on: August 22, 2008 at 9:06AM  

    pls boy

    see this difference

    Mac book pro

    2799 $

    2.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

    2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM - 2x1GB

    250GB Serial ATA @ 5400 rpm

    SuperDrive 8X DVD+R DL/DVD+RW/CD-RW)

    MacBook Pro 17-inch Widescreen Display

    None

    Backlit Keyboard (English) / User's Guide

    X3100 Intel

    Dell Xps 1730

    2.149 $

    Intel® Coreā„¢ 2 Duo T8300 (2.4GHz/800Mhz FSB/3MB cache)

    Genuine Windows Vista® Ultimate Bonus

    17 inch UltraSharp TrueLife Wide-screen WUXGA

    CD / DVD Burner (DVD+/-RW Drive)

    4GB1 Shared Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz

    Speed: 200GB2 SATA Hard Drive (7200RPM) Free Fall Sensor

    NVIDIA®GeForce®8700M GT graphics

    High Definition Audio 2.0

    Dell Wireless 1395 802.11g Mini Card

    85 WHr Lithium Ion Battery (9-cell)

    Smoke Grey

  10. Posted on: August 22, 2008 at 11:44AM  

    fastballweb: It takes a lot of work in the OS to support a large number of computer manufacturs and hardware. Microsoft does that work with windows, Apple doesn't. The competition at that Hardware\OEM level translates into cheaper overall computers.

    So yes, it is the OS.

  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: Macbook Case ♦ Apple MacBook and MacBook Pro News on October 17, 2008 at 8:05PM

    [...] an interesting post was made today on this site [...]...