Windows Vista 64-bit Today

There appears to be a shift taking place in the PC industry: the move from 32-bit to 64-bit PCs.

We've been tracking the change by looking at the percentage of 64-bit PCs connecting to Windows Update, and have seen a dramatic increase in recent months. The installed base of 64-bit Windows Vista PCs, as a percentage of all Windows Vista systems, has more than tripled in the U.S. in the last three months, while worldwide adoption has more than doubled during the same period.  Another view shows that 20% of new Windows Vista PCs in the U.S. connecting to Windows Update in June were 64-bit PCs, up from just 3% in March. Put more simply, usage of 64-bit Windows Vista is growing much more rapidly than 32-bit. Based on current trends, this growth will accelerate as the retail channel shifts to supplying a rapidly increasing assortment of 64-bit desktops and laptops.

64-bit PCs running 64-bit editions of Windows Vista typically have 4GB of memory or more. Compared to 32-bit systems, which top out at around 3GB of memory, 64-bit PCs can offer added responsiveness when running a lot of applications at the same time and have the potential for greater performance and new experiences as next-generations applications are written to take advantage of this new platform.

What started out as a gradual (some would say "glacial") movement toward 64-bit PCs, driven primarily by technology enthusiasts, seems to have turned into a swift transition, likely fueled by the falling cost of memory and consumers' desire to get the most out of their PCs.

This change begs a few questions:

Is the 64 bit market ready to go mainstream?

Will consumers realize the benefits from larger chips and 4GB or more of memory?

The answer to both of these questions is yes - but a qualified yes.

Preconfigured 64-bit PCs obtained from retailers or PC manufacturers should work quite well.  This is in stark contrast to the experience of many technology enthusiasts who built their 64-bit PC from scratch and may have had to scour the Web looking for drivers.  So, unless you really love to tinker with your PC, we suggest you buy a pre-built 64-bit PC at retail or directly from a PC manufacturer.

Beyond the box, you also need to consider the hardware peripherals and software programs you plan on using with your new PC. Any hardware or software product displaying the ‘Works with Windows Vista' or ‘Certified for Windows Vista' logo must be compatible with both the 32-bit and 64-bit editions of Windows Vista in order to warrant the use of the logo. If you don't see the logo, visit the Windows Vista Compatibility Center and check the 64-bit compatibility status. Hardware and software vendors continue to test and improve their products. Please note that the Windows Vista Compatibility Center is currently in beta. In some cases it is possible that a device may be marked as not compatible when in fact it is. I recommend that you also check with the device manufacturer to see if the compatibility status of your desired device has changed.

On the performance front, 64-bit PCs can provide a more responsive experience when running many applications simultaneously. Websites such as Bit.Tech.Net and Tom's Hardware have published performance benchmarks detailing some of the improvements realized from running the 64-bit PCs. In addition, PC Accelerators built into Windows Vista, such as Windows SuperFetch, improve performance by keeping commonly used programs in memory, even when the program is closed. More memory capacity on 64-bit PCs allows SuperFetch to do its job more efficiently.  

But if you only use your PC for a few tasks, and rarely do them at the same time, then you're unlikely to realize a measurable performance benefit today.  Of course, buying extra capacity for your future, unplanned needs is always worth considering.

In the future, we expect both compatibility and performance of 64-bit PCs to continue to improve. Most hardware devices have 64-bit drivers today and most software products work unmodified because of the 32-bit emulation technology in 64-bit Windows Vista (called WOW64). But there are some gaps, especially in the long tail of the market, but we expect rapid improvement now that 64-bit PCs are getting so popular.

Over time we'll see more 64-bit-optimized programs hit the market, which promise dramatic performance and experience improvements. A few key ones, like Adobe Lightroom & Photoshop and Sony Vegas Pro video editing software, are due to be released this fall. If you're a software or hardware developer, visit our 64-bit readiness page to learn more about 64-bit compatibility and optimization.


Comments

  1. Posted on: August 04, 2008 at 12:39AM  

    Paul I owned an Amiga 500 and a 1000, if not for the incompetence of the Commodore ownership that machine should have owned the market. I look back today and marvel at just how ahead of the times the Amiga was.

    I went the PC route after Commodore fell apart simply out of cost vs performance. I couldn't handle spending that much for a mac and deep down inside I damn well knew the Amiga was the better machine but Apple was the better marketer.

  2. Posted on: August 04, 2008 at 6:23PM  

    Wanted to know your thoughts on this?

    The Red Screen of Death!

    I had several but managed to get one on camera. dump code was 00000109 and I am suprised as I was under the impression it had been removed, so why am I seeing it in Vista ultimate X64 Sp1?

    Judge Death

  3. Posted on: August 04, 2008 at 9:30PM  

    I work for an ISV.  We need the large memory support available in Windows x64, and would really like to adopt x64, but we decided against it because of poor market penetration and availability.  It turns out that it is nearly impossible to buy a mainstream laptop or desktop PC from Dell or HP with Windows x64 pre-installed.  It is typically only an option on high end workstations, which represent a tiny fraction of the market, or on boutique systems, which represent an even smaller fraction of the market.  For Windows x64 to be truly successful, it needs to be readily available on new systems from major vendors.

    My feeling is that x64 will not reach critical mass until Microsoft drops the 32 bit version.  It is simply too expensive and too impractical for most vendors to support x64 in its current form.  Supporting both 32 and 64 bit in Vista is, I think, the single biggest mistake Microsoft made with Vista.  I can only hope that they rectify this w/ Windows 7.  If not, I suspect we will be looking for a new OS.

    This is clearly an area that Microsoft needs to take the bull by the horns, and LEAD the industry.  Windows 7 should be x64 and only x64.  

  4. Posted on: August 05, 2008 at 8:34PM  

    toddf, you need to take a second look at HP. They are offering Vista 64 bit on a wide range of consumer desktops and laptops. Gateway has some too.

  5. Posted on: August 05, 2008 at 10:41PM  

    kwdaves is right... at one of my clients the did do 64bit vista 64 (all new pc's in their case).   Their big mistake was buying a mix of different vista64's.

    Fortunately I got to do all the work, so I made good $$ on those systems.

    Its out there, depends on why and how much $$ u spend.

    But tod is right in many ways, that MS really needs to lead.  They are seemingly becoming 2ndrate.   Or at least acting like they are in expecting the public to put up with.

    To Bigiron:  

    Agreed.  I remember arguing with our sole hardware tech (pc & Mainframe) at Rockwell about computers.

    He thought the AMIGA (mine was a new  A3000) was a wizbang toy.

    Considering how pc's are today, then the same defination he used then applys to pc's & macs of today.

    I might consider replacing my vista64home with one of the others, but will give it time.

    Maybe by end of year things will be better.

  6. Posted on: August 08, 2008 at 6:00PM  

    I agree BIGIRON, the Amiga was king of the hill in its day.  I loved my Amiga, luckily the transition to Windows 95 was relatively easy back in the day, even without Deluxe Paint.  Actually I lie, I still miss Deluxe Paint and the fast boot times and ease of use of the Amiga OS which was very compartmentalised.

    Good times.

  7. Posted on: August 09, 2008 at 3:57PM  

    Well I think even if Windows Vista x64 version is well designed, it's not really worth it when almost all of the software you use are in 32bits mode, even IE7 and a lot of Vista features run by default as a 32bits version.

    Maybe it'll worth it when an operating system only supporting x64 with x64 softwares will see the day. Hence, Windows 7 could be the welcoming era of the true 64bits. I heard it will probably have a Virtual PC software integrate so we can run 32bits application through it.

    The real need is only for more advanced hardware, but the softwares must also follow the architecture.

  8. Posted on: August 12, 2008 at 5:19PM  

    What are the exact reasons for caring whether a given application is 32-bit if it runs well on 64-bit Vista.  I guess I don't care if it runs well enough for my need.  Frankly, for anyone who really wants everything to be 64-bit we're not going to get there if people do not adopt 64-bit OSs and that won't happen without reasonable 32-bit backward compatibility.

    And, by the way, the backward compatibility for 32-bit applications on Vista x64 seems to work just great from what I can see.

  9. Posted on: August 12, 2008 at 10:54PM  

    Upgrading to 64bit; does the CD give a quick scan on your present hard drive to determine what programs are compatible and what arent?  Is there any link on the net that does such a thing? Or if a person has like 127 programs installed (says Vista's control panel in programs and features) that I need to check each one separately to see if its 64bit compatible?  Thanks

  10. Posted on: August 13, 2008 at 8:40PM  

    Wow.  Even Microsoft's "Genuine Windows Validation Component" ActiveX control won't install in the 64-bit IE.  So, you have to use the dumbed-down 32-bit IE to download items Microsoft deems "valuable" for your 64-bit OS.

    Come on, Microsoft.  I've been a longtime defender, but throw us a bone every now and then.  I'm getting tired screaming into the wind and not having anyone lend me a hand...

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: News on July 31, 2008 at 11:37AM

    There appears to be a shift taking place in the PC industry: the move from 32-bit to 64-bit PCs. We've

  2. Posted by: infoworld.com on July 31, 2008 at 7:54PM

    People are beginning to use 64-bit Windows Vista on PCs in favor of the 32-bit version of the OS faster

  3. Posted by: Matt Johnson's Technical Adventures on July 31, 2008 at 9:21PM

    Network Access Protection (NAP) : Combining NAP enforcement methods The Storage Team at Microsoft - File

  4. Posted by: Evangelism 2.0: riflessioni sul business del software da un punto di vista privilegiato! on August 01, 2008 at 11:02AM

    Come ripreso da diverse fonti , la disponibilità di hardware adeguato inizia a spingere le installazioni

  5. Posted by: US ISV Developer Evangelism Team on August 01, 2008 at 7:39PM

    The installed base of 64-bit Windows Vista PCs, as a percentage of all Windows Vista systems, has more

  6. Posted by: chris e. avis - blogstrocity on August 02, 2008 at 4:26PM

    64! I have been telling IT Pros in my audience for about 2.5 years now that I gave 32 bit CPU's about

  7. Posted by: ISV blog-voer on August 04, 2008 at 5:54AM

    De installed base van 64-bit Windows Vista PCs op basis van de het totaal aantal Windows Vista systemen

  8. Posted by: support.com Blog on August 14, 2008 at 5:50PM

    Windows XP and Windows Vista Operating Systems The Windows Vista blog is reporting that Microsoft is

  9. Posted by: Team Blogs at Microsoft on August 14, 2008 at 6:58PM

    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 59 blogs have new articles in the past 7 days. 122 new articles found

  10. Posted by: Team Blogs at Microsoft on August 14, 2008 at 7:00PM

    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 59 blogs have new articles in the past 7 days. 122 new articles found

  11. Posted by: Team Blogs at Microsoft on August 14, 2008 at 8:17PM

    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 59 blogs have new articles in the past 7 days. 122 new articles found

  12. Posted by: Microsoft on ISVs on August 21, 2008 at 2:48PM

    The installed base of 64-bit Windows Vista PCs, as a percentage of all Windows Vista systems, has more

  13. Posted by: infoworld.com on August 25, 2008 at 4:33PM

    Twenty-one months after its initial release, what do we know about Windows Vista ? That home users hate

  14. Posted by: Dragon Naturally Speaking not Vista 64 bit « NJN Network on January 27, 2009 at 9:44AM

    Pingback from  Dragon Naturally Speaking not Vista 64 bit « NJN Network

  15. Posted by: Windows Vista » Windows Vista 64-bit Today - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows … on February 17, 2009 at 6:19AM

    Pingback from  Windows Vista » Windows Vista 64-bit Today - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows …

  16. Posted by: New build any issues? - Page 2 - AVForums.com on March 06, 2009 at 11:52AM

    Pingback from  New build any issues? - Page 2 - AVForums.com

  17. Posted by: Dragon Naturally Speaking not Vista 64 bit | NJN Network on July 04, 2009 at 3:13PM

    Pingback from  Dragon Naturally Speaking not Vista 64 bit | NJN Network