Windows Vista 64-bit Today

There appears to be a shift taking place in the PC industry: the move from 32-bit to 64-bit PCs.

We've been tracking the change by looking at the percentage of 64-bit PCs connecting to Windows Update, and have seen a dramatic increase in recent months. The installed base of 64-bit Windows Vista PCs, as a percentage of all Windows Vista systems, has more than tripled in the U.S. in the last three months, while worldwide adoption has more than doubled during the same period.  Another view shows that 20% of new Windows Vista PCs in the U.S. connecting to Windows Update in June were 64-bit PCs, up from just 3% in March. Put more simply, usage of 64-bit Windows Vista is growing much more rapidly than 32-bit. Based on current trends, this growth will accelerate as the retail channel shifts to supplying a rapidly increasing assortment of 64-bit desktops and laptops.

64-bit PCs running 64-bit editions of Windows Vista typically have 4GB of memory or more. Compared to 32-bit systems, which top out at around 3GB of memory, 64-bit PCs can offer added responsiveness when running a lot of applications at the same time and have the potential for greater performance and new experiences as next-generations applications are written to take advantage of this new platform.

What started out as a gradual (some would say "glacial") movement toward 64-bit PCs, driven primarily by technology enthusiasts, seems to have turned into a swift transition, likely fueled by the falling cost of memory and consumers' desire to get the most out of their PCs.

This change begs a few questions:

Is the 64 bit market ready to go mainstream?

Will consumers realize the benefits from larger chips and 4GB or more of memory?

The answer to both of these questions is yes - but a qualified yes.

Preconfigured 64-bit PCs obtained from retailers or PC manufacturers should work quite well.  This is in stark contrast to the experience of many technology enthusiasts who built their 64-bit PC from scratch and may have had to scour the Web looking for drivers.  So, unless you really love to tinker with your PC, we suggest you buy a pre-built 64-bit PC at retail or directly from a PC manufacturer.

Beyond the box, you also need to consider the hardware peripherals and software programs you plan on using with your new PC. Any hardware or software product displaying the ‘Works with Windows Vista' or ‘Certified for Windows Vista' logo must be compatible with both the 32-bit and 64-bit editions of Windows Vista in order to warrant the use of the logo. If you don't see the logo, visit the Windows Vista Compatibility Center and check the 64-bit compatibility status. Hardware and software vendors continue to test and improve their products. Please note that the Windows Vista Compatibility Center is currently in beta. In some cases it is possible that a device may be marked as not compatible when in fact it is. I recommend that you also check with the device manufacturer to see if the compatibility status of your desired device has changed.

On the performance front, 64-bit PCs can provide a more responsive experience when running many applications simultaneously. Websites such as Bit.Tech.Net and Tom's Hardware have published performance benchmarks detailing some of the improvements realized from running the 64-bit PCs. In addition, PC Accelerators built into Windows Vista, such as Windows SuperFetch, improve performance by keeping commonly used programs in memory, even when the program is closed. More memory capacity on 64-bit PCs allows SuperFetch to do its job more efficiently.  

But if you only use your PC for a few tasks, and rarely do them at the same time, then you're unlikely to realize a measurable performance benefit today.  Of course, buying extra capacity for your future, unplanned needs is always worth considering.

In the future, we expect both compatibility and performance of 64-bit PCs to continue to improve. Most hardware devices have 64-bit drivers today and most software products work unmodified because of the 32-bit emulation technology in 64-bit Windows Vista (called WOW64). But there are some gaps, especially in the long tail of the market, but we expect rapid improvement now that 64-bit PCs are getting so popular.

Over time we'll see more 64-bit-optimized programs hit the market, which promise dramatic performance and experience improvements. A few key ones, like Adobe Lightroom & Photoshop and Sony Vegas Pro video editing software, are due to be released this fall. If you're a software or hardware developer, visit our 64-bit readiness page to learn more about 64-bit compatibility and optimization.


Comments

  1. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 8:46AM  

    Hi

    I have been working with x64 XP and Vista since the earliest availability of these platforms, the potetial is immense.

    One question though, why does SideBar generate 600 page faults per second when simply displaying two clocks?

    There is no gain in having a superb OS if simple, basic out of the box utilities are allowed to impact it like this.

  2. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 9:46AM  

    In light of this new trend, what are Microsoft's plans for a 64 bit native version of Office?

  3. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 11:45AM  

    I believe users are ready to for Vista 64-bit. The problem is 3rd party vendors and sometimes microsoft in my opinion. For example, I have been running 64-bit vista ever since it came out. By then I changed at least 5 GPUs. The original driver of each GPU  always BSOD and I had to wait for at least 3 releases to get a proper driver (nVidia been the major violator although their drivers are signed). Another example is "Games for Windows" logo which guarantees games will work under windows. Some of those games need super patching and limiting game quality in order to work.

  4. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 12:54PM  

    64-vit Vista has been a pretty painless experience.  My only complaints are the lack of some browser plug-ins for the 64-bit version of IE, and the fact that even today it seems that 90% of the apps I use must take advantage of 32-bit compatibility mode.

    Also, as mentioned by chrishedlund, it would be nice if Microsoft would lead the way with a true 64-bit version of it's flagship product.

  5. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 1:07PM  

    @Bryan,

    Check out Vista 64-bit codecs package: http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=573&Itemid=72

    It even adds codecs for Media Center.

    This codec pack comes with an interesting tools:

    - Enable 64-bit WMP as Default

    This will change all your shortcuts on the desktop, startmenu, quick launch bar and set all file association to Windows Media Player to the 64-bit version. All you have to do is run it from the start menu once for ever. If you don't get prompt (and seams that it did not work), that means that it successfully performed without errors or warnings its task.

  6. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 1:21PM  

    I started out 64bit Vista, using the AMD chip.  But, after PC issues (not processor related, but still hardware issues), I switched back to 32bit Vista.  Imagine my surprise when all of the applications I use ran faster and worked better once running 32bit.  Granted it was also a difference between and Intel chip and a AMD chip.

  7. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 1:37PM  

    @superpotato

    Is the built-in Windows Firewall with Advanced Security not good enough for your needs?

  8. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 3:16PM  

    I've been using Vista x64 for months now and really love it, except...

    Most of the applications that I use on a daily basis install shell extensions or other such utilities that don't work on a 64 bit system.

    It is ridiculous that Office 2007 doesn't provide any 64 bit support! It seems Microsoft is it's own worst enemy in this regard.

    I'm very sad because I'm going to have to move back to 32 bits just to get productive again.

  9. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 3:42PM  

    I've been using Vista 64 bit since about end Oct 2006 - I'd been on the beta prog.

    I've had minimal issues with 64 bit. Some differences sure as in registry/file virtualization, AV, and a few minor apps in early days, but all my devices worked from day 1 (with some manual test signing)

    In fact the only apps I had problems were with Microsoft apps (sorry guys), mostly the Live* suite, esp Live OneCare. I was somewhat disappointed to see MS not supporting their own new OS through beta programs.

    I "only" have 3Gb, but it's nice to know I have headroom, with the machine taking up to 8Gb, and it removes so many of those barriers around the 2,3,4 Gb marks so well worth it.

  10. Posted on: July 31, 2008 at 8:39PM  

    I was afraid of 64bit because of horror stories i had heard through the years. I ran Vista 32 for the first year, after SP1 came out I thought I would give 64bit a try from technet. I threw 8 gig of ram in my machine and installed the system.

    I have to say, I am impressed and amazed at the lack of problems I have had with drivers and software.

    albeit i'm no gamer so I have no clue if games are an issue.

    needless to say, i'm never going back.

    Those of you who will balk at 8gig of ram, let me put it this way, with itunes, firefox 3, outlook 2007 and nothing else running i'm using 3.5 gig of the ram. What is cool, I can open my VM or a few more, move that sucker up passed 5 gig consumed and everything is nimble.

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: News on July 31, 2008 at 11:37AM

    There appears to be a shift taking place in the PC industry: the move from 32-bit to 64-bit PCs. We've

  2. Posted by: infoworld.com on July 31, 2008 at 7:54PM

    People are beginning to use 64-bit Windows Vista on PCs in favor of the 32-bit version of the OS faster

  3. Posted by: Matt Johnson's Technical Adventures on July 31, 2008 at 9:21PM

    Network Access Protection (NAP) : Combining NAP enforcement methods The Storage Team at Microsoft - File

  4. Posted by: Evangelism 2.0: riflessioni sul business del software da un punto di vista privilegiato! on August 01, 2008 at 11:02AM

    Come ripreso da diverse fonti , la disponibilità di hardware adeguato inizia a spingere le installazioni

  5. Posted by: US ISV Developer Evangelism Team on August 01, 2008 at 7:39PM

    The installed base of 64-bit Windows Vista PCs, as a percentage of all Windows Vista systems, has more

  6. Posted by: chris e. avis - blogstrocity on August 02, 2008 at 4:26PM

    64! I have been telling IT Pros in my audience for about 2.5 years now that I gave 32 bit CPU's about

  7. Posted by: ISV blog-voer on August 04, 2008 at 5:54AM

    De installed base van 64-bit Windows Vista PCs op basis van de het totaal aantal Windows Vista systemen

  8. Posted by: support.com Blog on August 14, 2008 at 5:50PM

    Windows XP and Windows Vista Operating Systems The Windows Vista blog is reporting that Microsoft is

  9. Posted by: Team Blogs at Microsoft on August 14, 2008 at 6:58PM

    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 59 blogs have new articles in the past 7 days. 122 new articles found

  10. Posted by: Team Blogs at Microsoft on August 14, 2008 at 7:00PM

    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 59 blogs have new articles in the past 7 days. 122 new articles found

  11. Posted by: Team Blogs at Microsoft on August 14, 2008 at 8:17PM

    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 59 blogs have new articles in the past 7 days. 122 new articles found

  12. Posted by: Microsoft on ISVs on August 21, 2008 at 2:48PM

    The installed base of 64-bit Windows Vista PCs, as a percentage of all Windows Vista systems, has more

  13. Posted by: infoworld.com on August 25, 2008 at 4:33PM

    Twenty-one months after its initial release, what do we know about Windows Vista ? That home users hate

  14. Posted by: Dragon Naturally Speaking not Vista 64 bit « NJN Network on January 27, 2009 at 9:44AM

    Pingback from  Dragon Naturally Speaking not Vista 64 bit « NJN Network

  15. Posted by: Windows Vista » Windows Vista 64-bit Today - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows … on February 17, 2009 at 6:19AM

    Pingback from  Windows Vista » Windows Vista 64-bit Today - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows …

  16. Posted by: New build any issues? - Page 2 - AVForums.com on March 06, 2009 at 11:52AM

    Pingback from  New build any issues? - Page 2 - AVForums.com

  17. Posted by: Dragon Naturally Speaking not Vista 64 bit | NJN Network on July 04, 2009 at 3:13PM

    Pingback from  Dragon Naturally Speaking not Vista 64 bit | NJN Network