Communicating Windows 7

Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the next version-which begs two questions: 1) is Microsoft working on a new version of Windows, and if so, 2) why aren't you talking about it?

I thought I would spend a minute giving you an update on where we are. First, yes, we are working on a new version of Windows. As you likely know, it's called Windows 7.We are always looking for new ways to deliver great experiences for our customers.  This is especially true of Windows - where we're constantly examining trends in hardware, software and services to ensure that we continue to drive the innovation that has both made Windows the world's most popular operating system and has provided a foundation on which our partners built great products and businesses. When we shipped Windows 2000, we were already working on Windows XP and we started working on Windows Vista even before we released Windows XP. So naturally, we've been thinking about the investments we made in Windows Vista and how we can build on these for the next version of Windows.

What is a little different today is when and how we are talking about the next version of Windows.  So, why the change in approach?  We know that when we talk about our plans for the next release of Windows, people take action. As a result, we can significantly impact our partners and our customers if we broadly share information that later changes.  With Windows 7, we're trying to more carefully plan how we share information with our customers and partners.  This means sharing the right level of information at the right time depending on the needs of the audience.  For instance, several months ago we began privately sharing our preliminary plans for Windows 7 with software and hardware partners who build on the Windows platform.  This gave them an opportunity to give us feedback and gave us the opportunity to incorporate their input into our plans. As the product becomes more complete, we will have the opportunity to share our plans more broadly. Steven Sinofsky, Windows and Windows Live Engineering SVP, talks more about this in his interview with CNET's Ina Fried, published today: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-9951638-56.html.

We know that this is a change in our approach, but we are confident that it will help us not only to build even better products, but also to be more predictable in the delivery of our products. We also know that this change has led to some confusion, so we would like to share information today that will hopefully clear up some of this.

Before we talk about what's ahead, we should take a look at where we are today with Windows Vista.  From a quality perspective, both Windows Vista SP1 and the ecosystem have delivered measurable progress in the six dimensions of quality we track -- device compatibility, application compatibility, reliability, performance, battery life and security. The business results speak for themselves. As of March 31, we had sold more than 140 million Windows Vista licenses, and analyst firm forecasts indicate that Windows Vista adoption among businesses is on a similar pace as Windows XP in similar timeframes. Millions of enterprise users are already running Windows Vista, and we invite you to read their stories published in more than 100 case studies. The benefits they are experiencing range from energy conservation, lower TCO for mobile users, and greater security. Our job is not done, but we've worked hard with our ecosystem to improve the quality of Windows Vista and we're pleased with the customer response.

Another question we often get asked is whether Windows 7 is a major release. The answer is "yes"  -- it's hard to describe any product that is used by millions of people and worked on by thousands of engineers as anything else. That said, the long-term architectural investments we introduced in Windows Vista and then refined for Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 will carry forward in Windows 7. Windows Vista established a very solid foundation, particularly on subsystems such as graphics, audio, and storage. Windows Server 2008 was built on that foundation and Windows 7 will be as well. Contrary to some speculation, Microsoft is not creating a new kernel for Windows 7. Rather, we are refining the kernel architecture and componentization model introduced in Windows Vista.  While these changes will increase our engineering agility, they will not impact the user experience or reduce application or hardware compatibility. In fact, one of our design goals for Windows 7 is that it will run on the recommended hardware we specified for Windows Vista and that the applications and devices that work with Windows Vista will be compatible with Windows 7.

We are well into the development process of Windows 7, and we're happy to report that we're still on track to ship approximately three years after the general availability of Windows Vista. As always, we will be releasing early builds of Windows 7 prior to its general availability as a means to gain feedback, but we're not yet ready to discuss timing and specific plans for any Beta releases. In the meantime, customers can confidently continue with their Windows Vista deployment plans.


Comments

  1. Posted on: June 04, 2008 at 1:27PM  

    I'm wondering if you could tell us where to get in on giving constructive feedback to the Windows 7 team. I think what's needed is to do a ground-up rewrite, eliminating backwards compatibility except perhaps in an included hypervisor for virtualization of legacy environments. No more Windows 9x code. Heck, no more Windows NT/2000 code. This is why Windows is such a pig. And I say that with the best of intentions, as I've made a career out of Windows. Seriously. Rewrite every piece of the core OS from scratch and just include a hypervisor to emulate legacy environments. I know it's a huge project. But it's the only way to really compete with Linux and OS-X in the corporate space, where you're going to see very soon that you're hemoragghing users.

  2. Posted on: June 18, 2008 at 3:56PM  

    You know Chris after years in process improvement, QA and continuous process management--I have to say I agree with the decision to be more "closed" and less "open." I believe some of the comments above reflect mismanaged expectations than real frustration with the product. Transparent communication between your engineers, our engineers, etc on the back end is essential. Sometimes we need to work together and manage internally first--before we let it all "hang out" in the ecosystem at large.

  3. Posted on: July 04, 2008 at 1:26PM  

    Recently i viewed few windows seven  videos ,well can u answer  why would any one stretch out their arms in order to  use paint or any other  application on a laptop or a desktop monitor (windows 7 ready) which is placed parallel to one’s body  ?. Wouldn’t it be annoying to one having this feature but finding it useless?  .This touch concept works perfectly for Microsoft surface as people sit around it to share data, snaps etc  and also on Portable PC’s (without keyboards). But how on normal laptop’s en desktops with other input devices

  4. Posted on: July 20, 2008 at 8:07AM  

    I just read an article that Julie Larsen-Green has joined the Windows seven UI team she was the force behind the ribbon in MS Word, that was not to well received.  I don't think Microsoft understands that major changes to the UI such as vista, IE 7 and still IE 8, and Office is very counter productive, for many users and companies.  So Microsoft is taking a person that many believe made MS word unusable and put her in charge of making Windows 7 more usable?  That's a bit like putting the fox in charge of the hen house. There is one advantage to this though, many companies are making money off of add-on's to make the UI's for office more user friendly and look the way it use to.

  5. Posted on: July 29, 2008 at 7:57AM  

    لاحقا ان شاء الله

    بالتوفيق

    I THINK 7 IS EASTER THAN VISTA & MORE SAFE

  6. Posted on: August 09, 2008 at 6:04AM  

    As I read through these posts,it became very apparent I don't keep up as much as I'd like to. I found out about Windows 7 about 1 1/2 to 2 months ago and surprised everyone I knew with the "interesting" news.

    Here's how it hit me. Simply. Perfect. Business. Microsoft doesn't hate the end-user, but they aren't impressed with the recent whining either; it was expected.

    Here's how it's playing out right before your eyes:

    XP is sort of old. We have cool new ideas for GUI. Technology is changing. What do we do.... GOT IT! Let's make something pretty and flashy with new gizmos to keep people focused on the future.

    Ok, so time passes and here's VISTA!!!!!! pause.

    Back track a few months before shipping Vista. Uh, guys, this just won't fly "for real"... I GOT IT!!! Let's use the foundation (since we've already wasted so much time) and develop Windows 7 in parallel. Let's give it a secret code name like "Afterburn" or "The Knife Twister".

    So, months go by development continues and then guess what? Vista is no longer a concern. Forget about support. Forget about crying about it. Vista (and whatever critisism followed) was out of Microsoft's mind before it hit the shelf. And thanks to the failure and tears, they KNOW you'll be salivating for something better. Simply. Perfect. Business. But seriously, I can't wait for 7. I'm rather excited!

  7. broderm2k
    Posted on: October 29, 2008 at 4:20AM  

    I m quiet impressed by microsoft claiming Vista being on the same market level as Xp

    people like me have been using Xp SP2 for a long time and we were impetiantely waiting for Vista and when Vista finally came out we ran for it and do you(microsoft) ask yourself why a lot of us downgraded back to Xp, simple, Vista is one of the worst OS in microsoft history following the trates of windows 2000 and dont tell me you doing well with Vista because you not, no wonder you are are planning to launch another OS(windows 7)

    my pc was is custom built by myslef and running on 4gb of ram and a 3.4ghz processor with a 1gb graphics card, i invested money on my machine but Vista proved me wrong with frequent hangs,crahes and generally slow, its compatibility range is nothing compared to Xp

    the truth is you launched Vista prematurely and it was not what we were promised, i just hope you Windows 7 doesnt have the same bugs as Vista

  8. Juan
    Posted on: October 29, 2008 at 6:01AM  

    Please let all the completion ports related stuff like in Windows Vista. It is awesome compare with XP.

    Go for it!

    Juan

  9. Posted on: October 30, 2008 at 8:02AM  

    sou amante de pc e gostaria de receber windows7

    para teste

  10. wayne O
    Posted on: November 08, 2008 at 8:47AM  

    I support Microsoft by buying and using Vista 1 year later they bail on Vista for Windows 7 and expect me to shell out more money! What A Scam !!! I should be given windows 7 for free

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: GottaBeMobile on May 27, 2008 at 8:22AM
  2. Posted by: News on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the

  3. Posted by: ZenIT Blog on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Da qualche tempo in rete si sente parlare sempre più spesso di Windows 7 (quasi come contro altare

  4. Posted by: Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition on May 27, 2008 at 10:54AM

    The timing of this is a tad suspicious. Maybe this was planned weeks ago, as the start of a larger communications

  5. Posted by: Mark Lomas on May 27, 2008 at 11:12AM

    Microsoft learning from past mistakes?

  6. Posted by: Student Union on May 27, 2008 at 3:01PM
  7. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 7:11PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  8. Posted by: Heavy on the Technical on May 27, 2008 at 7:30PM

    For those who don't read the blogs/new we have a new OS on its way. The following comments/views do not

  9. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 10:46PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  10. Posted by: Technological Musings on May 28, 2008 at 11:32AM

    Well, looks like the early information on Windows 7 might be wrong.  According to an interview with Steven Sinofsky, Senior Vice President of Windows and Windows Live Engineering at Microsoft, there are a few details you may have heard that may not

  11. Posted by: Maarten van Stam - Soft As In Software :-) on May 28, 2008 at 7:46PM

    Windows Vista is done (ok, ok, some 'small' patchwork is needed to iron out the wrinkles). Ready for

  12. Posted by: The things that are better left unspoken on June 01, 2008 at 2:08PM

    All you need to know is... ... What you already know. In our society information is the greatest good.

  13. Posted by: meneame.net on June 02, 2008 at 10:53AM

    Chris Flores (director del equipo de Comunicaciones al Cliente de Microsoft) señala que una de las prioridades de Redmond en el desarrollo de Windows 7 es que este sea capaz de correr bien en cualquier PC que actualmente soporte Windows Vista. Visto en

  14. Posted by: SuperSite Blog on June 02, 2008 at 2:24PM

    If there's one thing Microsoft is doing poorly right now, it's communicating about Windows 7

  15. Posted by: Infosys | Microsoft on June 04, 2008 at 12:02AM

    What is Windows 7

  16. Posted by: windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends on January 08, 2009 at 9:19AM

    Pingback from  windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends

  17. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog on January 08, 2009 at 9:09PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog

  18. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  19. Posted by: Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 11:23PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista

  20. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 5:36AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  21. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  22. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  23. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  24. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 5:02AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  25. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  26. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 11, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  27. Posted by: Windows 7 public beta: First impressions on January 11, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 public beta: First impressions

  28. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 10:59PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  29. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 11:05PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  30. Posted by: Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home on January 12, 2009 at 4:59AM

    Pingback from  Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home

  31. Posted by: This Week???s Entertainment News on January 12, 2009 at 5:18AM

    Pingback from  This Week???s Entertainment News

  32. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  33. Posted by: Palm announces webOS and Pre phone on January 12, 2009 at 7:01AM

    Pingback from  Palm announces webOS and Pre phone

  34. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 12:55PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  35. Posted by: Scot???s Newsletter Blog » Blog Archive » More about Windows 7 Performance on February 04, 2009 at 6:50PM

    Pingback from  Scot???s Newsletter Blog  » Blog Archive   » More about Windows 7 Performance

  36. Posted by: Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso on February 06, 2009 at 9:32PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso

  37. Posted by: Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005 on May 03, 2009 at 7:27AM

    Pingback from  Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005

  38. Posted by: Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware on July 25, 2009 at 10:48PM

    Pingback from  Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware

  39. Posted by: Twitter Trackbacks for Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog [windowsteamblog.com] on Topsy.com on August 29, 2009 at 8:32AM

    Pingback from  Twitter Trackbacks for                 Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog         [windowsteamblog.com]        on Topsy.com