Communicating Windows 7

Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the next version-which begs two questions: 1) is Microsoft working on a new version of Windows, and if so, 2) why aren't you talking about it?

I thought I would spend a minute giving you an update on where we are. First, yes, we are working on a new version of Windows. As you likely know, it's called Windows 7.We are always looking for new ways to deliver great experiences for our customers.  This is especially true of Windows - where we're constantly examining trends in hardware, software and services to ensure that we continue to drive the innovation that has both made Windows the world's most popular operating system and has provided a foundation on which our partners built great products and businesses. When we shipped Windows 2000, we were already working on Windows XP and we started working on Windows Vista even before we released Windows XP. So naturally, we've been thinking about the investments we made in Windows Vista and how we can build on these for the next version of Windows.

What is a little different today is when and how we are talking about the next version of Windows.  So, why the change in approach?  We know that when we talk about our plans for the next release of Windows, people take action. As a result, we can significantly impact our partners and our customers if we broadly share information that later changes.  With Windows 7, we're trying to more carefully plan how we share information with our customers and partners.  This means sharing the right level of information at the right time depending on the needs of the audience.  For instance, several months ago we began privately sharing our preliminary plans for Windows 7 with software and hardware partners who build on the Windows platform.  This gave them an opportunity to give us feedback and gave us the opportunity to incorporate their input into our plans. As the product becomes more complete, we will have the opportunity to share our plans more broadly. Steven Sinofsky, Windows and Windows Live Engineering SVP, talks more about this in his interview with CNET's Ina Fried, published today: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-9951638-56.html.

We know that this is a change in our approach, but we are confident that it will help us not only to build even better products, but also to be more predictable in the delivery of our products. We also know that this change has led to some confusion, so we would like to share information today that will hopefully clear up some of this.

Before we talk about what's ahead, we should take a look at where we are today with Windows Vista.  From a quality perspective, both Windows Vista SP1 and the ecosystem have delivered measurable progress in the six dimensions of quality we track -- device compatibility, application compatibility, reliability, performance, battery life and security. The business results speak for themselves. As of March 31, we had sold more than 140 million Windows Vista licenses, and analyst firm forecasts indicate that Windows Vista adoption among businesses is on a similar pace as Windows XP in similar timeframes. Millions of enterprise users are already running Windows Vista, and we invite you to read their stories published in more than 100 case studies. The benefits they are experiencing range from energy conservation, lower TCO for mobile users, and greater security. Our job is not done, but we've worked hard with our ecosystem to improve the quality of Windows Vista and we're pleased with the customer response.

Another question we often get asked is whether Windows 7 is a major release. The answer is "yes"  -- it's hard to describe any product that is used by millions of people and worked on by thousands of engineers as anything else. That said, the long-term architectural investments we introduced in Windows Vista and then refined for Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 will carry forward in Windows 7. Windows Vista established a very solid foundation, particularly on subsystems such as graphics, audio, and storage. Windows Server 2008 was built on that foundation and Windows 7 will be as well. Contrary to some speculation, Microsoft is not creating a new kernel for Windows 7. Rather, we are refining the kernel architecture and componentization model introduced in Windows Vista.  While these changes will increase our engineering agility, they will not impact the user experience or reduce application or hardware compatibility. In fact, one of our design goals for Windows 7 is that it will run on the recommended hardware we specified for Windows Vista and that the applications and devices that work with Windows Vista will be compatible with Windows 7.

We are well into the development process of Windows 7, and we're happy to report that we're still on track to ship approximately three years after the general availability of Windows Vista. As always, we will be releasing early builds of Windows 7 prior to its general availability as a means to gain feedback, but we're not yet ready to discuss timing and specific plans for any Beta releases. In the meantime, customers can confidently continue with their Windows Vista deployment plans.


Comments

  1. Posted on: May 31, 2008 at 6:38PM  

    OK so it must be my link to my Charter website and a Windows Vista Technet URL as well, the Spammer is picking up in my Post and that means anything 'Charter' or 'Windows Vista Technet' would be classed as Spam, can someone change a setting! Heres the remainder without both links. Still trying to get this posted here. It really should not be a issue as stated in Help ... When word filters are enabled certain words that are deemed to be offensive are filtered and replaced with the ‘*’ character.

    Sure set programming cannot be hibernated, its a on-off matter like iPhone is so a upgrade does change nothing as the same buttonry and architecture is still doing the same old sorting routines and this is a bad oman for AT&T whom goes on what Apple tells them to do and nothing extra so AT&T really cannot input anything which would make much difference. So I wouldn't want iPhone in a Electric Vehicle at all and what I would want is a built-in much similar to the Lexus LS600H made in Japan, it is a handsfree with a possible remote headset but offers a extra punch for security in case of tampering or theft it can auto dial security having preaccessed GPS, Lexus Link Advisor. The Lexus LS600H was recently purchased by Paul McCartney {Charter Link Removed}.

  2. Posted on: June 01, 2008 at 12:51AM  

    mmm in acer aspire 9410z runs better Linux, windows vista runs tooo slooow XD conclusion: linux is better than windows xp, vista and windows 7 ...

    salu2

  3. Posted on: June 01, 2008 at 5:31AM  

    I have a Vista-certified Tablet PC that had Vista RTM & SP1 installed 5 times now, and something goes wrong every time with one driver or another or install fails. At present it's sitting in a corner since it can longer find its keyboard drivers after the latest format and reinstall. A month of PSS time has completely failed to help, so I'm going back to XP.

  4. Posted on: June 01, 2008 at 5:42AM  

    hitmouse, what do you mean by PSS time?

    I suggest taking a look at our Windows Vista SP1 FAQ and contacting Microsoft Support who have agents who can help troubleshoot the issues you are having with Windows Vista SP1.

    http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsexperience/pages/windows-vista-sp1-faq.aspx

    Thanks,

    Brandon

  5. Posted on: June 01, 2008 at 9:55AM  

    Spike, it's no use saying how much better Linux runs when you can't get the software you want and need on it (and don't say use WINE, compatibility is a joke). I don't know about you, but I don't sit all day staring at the OS transferring files, I use the OS to run apps. So no, Linux is not better, not until it can run ALL the software I need and want.

  6. Posted on: June 01, 2008 at 8:32PM  

    "From a quality perspective, both Windows Vista SP1 and the ecosystem have delivered measurable progress in the six dimensions of quality we track -- device compatibility, application compatibility, reliability, performance, battery life and security."

    Well according to the same six dimensions your current XP SP3 users track (oh Mr. Microsoft Communications) here is what the people who use XP have to say about Vista's alleged "success".

    Device compatibility. New stuff does not work without lots of tinkering, even those with the "Vista compatible" logo.  FAIL

    Application compatibility. Too many legacy applications and many new applications carrying the "Vista compatible" logo won't run on Vista. FAIL

    Reliability.  Way more reboots and blue screens than XP on her worst day.  FAIL

    Performance.  Not even close to XP performace, even when you handicap the comparison by giving Vista more RAM and a faster CPU.  FAIL

    Battery life.  No improvement.  About the same as XP.  Neutral

    Security.  No improvement and GPU is so annoying as to be worthless. And speaking of security, who in their right mind relies on Microsoft (anything) for securty?  FAIL.

    Remind me again, Mr. Microsoft Communication, what, exactly are you basing your glowing self-assement on?

  7. Posted on: June 01, 2008 at 11:05PM  

    Brandon - you may not have been at MS long enough to know that PSS = Product Support Services.

    I have spent a month with MS getting email and phone support, most of it a complete waste of time. At the end of the period, my Tablet was in a worse state due to the diagnostic code they asked me to run. I could no longer get Windows Updates and any other software I tried to install, including Windows Live Messenger and Adobe Acrobat simply generated .NET assembly errors. A fresh install with Vista Ultimate SP1 made no difference other than it being unable to find keyboard or flash memory drivers any more. Ironically the pen is about the only thing that does work.

  8. Posted on: June 01, 2008 at 11:39PM  

    Regarding Windows 7 ... I just wish MS would make a rock solid, functional, and efficient OS. There is no need to make it flashy and cute. But if you feel you need to, make the cutesy stuff options that can be easily turned on and off. Of all the potential users, only Joe Average home user is going to care about flash and glitz and cute. The larger share just want function and stability. I like many others on here, have been with MS since the early DOS days. Let Apple be cute toylike system. Let Windows be the system for serious computing. Nuff said.

  9. Posted on: June 02, 2008 at 5:30AM  

    hitmouse, I am sorry to hear about your issues. If you would like - you can email me your contact information and I can see if I can escalate your issue here on my side. Send me a PM here:

    http://windowsvistablog.com/forums/AddPost.aspx?ForumID=0&UserId=16682

    Thanks,

    Brandon

  10. Posted on: June 03, 2008 at 10:55AM  

    As long as the new windows operating system eats less memory and uses less cpu i'll be happy, and new features that dont exist currently.

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: GottaBeMobile on May 27, 2008 at 8:22AM
  2. Posted by: News on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the

  3. Posted by: ZenIT Blog on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Da qualche tempo in rete si sente parlare sempre più spesso di Windows 7 (quasi come contro altare

  4. Posted by: Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition on May 27, 2008 at 10:54AM

    The timing of this is a tad suspicious. Maybe this was planned weeks ago, as the start of a larger communications

  5. Posted by: Mark Lomas on May 27, 2008 at 11:12AM

    Microsoft learning from past mistakes?

  6. Posted by: Student Union on May 27, 2008 at 3:01PM
  7. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 7:11PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  8. Posted by: Heavy on the Technical on May 27, 2008 at 7:30PM

    For those who don't read the blogs/new we have a new OS on its way. The following comments/views do not

  9. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 10:46PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  10. Posted by: Technological Musings on May 28, 2008 at 11:32AM

    Well, looks like the early information on Windows 7 might be wrong.  According to an interview with Steven Sinofsky, Senior Vice President of Windows and Windows Live Engineering at Microsoft, there are a few details you may have heard that may not

  11. Posted by: Maarten van Stam - Soft As In Software :-) on May 28, 2008 at 7:46PM

    Windows Vista is done (ok, ok, some 'small' patchwork is needed to iron out the wrinkles). Ready for

  12. Posted by: The things that are better left unspoken on June 01, 2008 at 2:08PM

    All you need to know is... ... What you already know. In our society information is the greatest good.

  13. Posted by: meneame.net on June 02, 2008 at 10:53AM

    Chris Flores (director del equipo de Comunicaciones al Cliente de Microsoft) señala que una de las prioridades de Redmond en el desarrollo de Windows 7 es que este sea capaz de correr bien en cualquier PC que actualmente soporte Windows Vista. Visto en

  14. Posted by: SuperSite Blog on June 02, 2008 at 2:24PM

    If there's one thing Microsoft is doing poorly right now, it's communicating about Windows 7

  15. Posted by: Infosys | Microsoft on June 04, 2008 at 12:02AM

    What is Windows 7

  16. Posted by: windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends on January 08, 2009 at 9:19AM

    Pingback from  windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends

  17. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog on January 08, 2009 at 9:09PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog

  18. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  19. Posted by: Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 11:23PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista

  20. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 5:36AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  21. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  22. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  23. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  24. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 5:02AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  25. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  26. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 11, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  27. Posted by: Windows 7 public beta: First impressions on January 11, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 public beta: First impressions

  28. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 10:59PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  29. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 11:05PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  30. Posted by: Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home on January 12, 2009 at 4:59AM

    Pingback from  Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home

  31. Posted by: This Week???s Entertainment News on January 12, 2009 at 5:18AM

    Pingback from  This Week???s Entertainment News

  32. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  33. Posted by: Palm announces webOS and Pre phone on January 12, 2009 at 7:01AM

    Pingback from  Palm announces webOS and Pre phone

  34. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 12:55PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  35. Posted by: Scot???s Newsletter Blog » Blog Archive » More about Windows 7 Performance on February 04, 2009 at 6:50PM

    Pingback from  Scot???s Newsletter Blog  » Blog Archive   » More about Windows 7 Performance

  36. Posted by: Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso on February 06, 2009 at 9:32PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso

  37. Posted by: Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005 on May 03, 2009 at 7:27AM

    Pingback from  Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005

  38. Posted by: Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware on July 25, 2009 at 10:48PM

    Pingback from  Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware

  39. Posted by: Twitter Trackbacks for Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog [windowsteamblog.com] on Topsy.com on August 29, 2009 at 8:32AM

    Pingback from  Twitter Trackbacks for                 Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog         [windowsteamblog.com]        on Topsy.com