Communicating Windows 7

Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the next version-which begs two questions: 1) is Microsoft working on a new version of Windows, and if so, 2) why aren't you talking about it?

I thought I would spend a minute giving you an update on where we are. First, yes, we are working on a new version of Windows. As you likely know, it's called Windows 7.We are always looking for new ways to deliver great experiences for our customers.  This is especially true of Windows - where we're constantly examining trends in hardware, software and services to ensure that we continue to drive the innovation that has both made Windows the world's most popular operating system and has provided a foundation on which our partners built great products and businesses. When we shipped Windows 2000, we were already working on Windows XP and we started working on Windows Vista even before we released Windows XP. So naturally, we've been thinking about the investments we made in Windows Vista and how we can build on these for the next version of Windows.

What is a little different today is when and how we are talking about the next version of Windows.  So, why the change in approach?  We know that when we talk about our plans for the next release of Windows, people take action. As a result, we can significantly impact our partners and our customers if we broadly share information that later changes.  With Windows 7, we're trying to more carefully plan how we share information with our customers and partners.  This means sharing the right level of information at the right time depending on the needs of the audience.  For instance, several months ago we began privately sharing our preliminary plans for Windows 7 with software and hardware partners who build on the Windows platform.  This gave them an opportunity to give us feedback and gave us the opportunity to incorporate their input into our plans. As the product becomes more complete, we will have the opportunity to share our plans more broadly. Steven Sinofsky, Windows and Windows Live Engineering SVP, talks more about this in his interview with CNET's Ina Fried, published today: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-9951638-56.html.

We know that this is a change in our approach, but we are confident that it will help us not only to build even better products, but also to be more predictable in the delivery of our products. We also know that this change has led to some confusion, so we would like to share information today that will hopefully clear up some of this.

Before we talk about what's ahead, we should take a look at where we are today with Windows Vista.  From a quality perspective, both Windows Vista SP1 and the ecosystem have delivered measurable progress in the six dimensions of quality we track -- device compatibility, application compatibility, reliability, performance, battery life and security. The business results speak for themselves. As of March 31, we had sold more than 140 million Windows Vista licenses, and analyst firm forecasts indicate that Windows Vista adoption among businesses is on a similar pace as Windows XP in similar timeframes. Millions of enterprise users are already running Windows Vista, and we invite you to read their stories published in more than 100 case studies. The benefits they are experiencing range from energy conservation, lower TCO for mobile users, and greater security. Our job is not done, but we've worked hard with our ecosystem to improve the quality of Windows Vista and we're pleased with the customer response.

Another question we often get asked is whether Windows 7 is a major release. The answer is "yes"  -- it's hard to describe any product that is used by millions of people and worked on by thousands of engineers as anything else. That said, the long-term architectural investments we introduced in Windows Vista and then refined for Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 will carry forward in Windows 7. Windows Vista established a very solid foundation, particularly on subsystems such as graphics, audio, and storage. Windows Server 2008 was built on that foundation and Windows 7 will be as well. Contrary to some speculation, Microsoft is not creating a new kernel for Windows 7. Rather, we are refining the kernel architecture and componentization model introduced in Windows Vista.  While these changes will increase our engineering agility, they will not impact the user experience or reduce application or hardware compatibility. In fact, one of our design goals for Windows 7 is that it will run on the recommended hardware we specified for Windows Vista and that the applications and devices that work with Windows Vista will be compatible with Windows 7.

We are well into the development process of Windows 7, and we're happy to report that we're still on track to ship approximately three years after the general availability of Windows Vista. As always, we will be releasing early builds of Windows 7 prior to its general availability as a means to gain feedback, but we're not yet ready to discuss timing and specific plans for any Beta releases. In the meantime, customers can confidently continue with their Windows Vista deployment plans.


Comments

  1. Posted on: May 29, 2008 at 3:08PM  

    My post is not posting this topic, is there a problem in its reading. Contact me.

  2. Posted on: May 29, 2008 at 3:17PM  

    Charles Michael Jones, I don't quite understand. You having a issue with leaving a comment here? I can check to see if it got caught in our spam filter.

    Thanks,

    Brandon

  3. Posted on: May 29, 2008 at 8:17PM  

    Let me know when the beta is out. I am 69 years old and don't have a life. I have an extra swapable hard drive that I would love to see how really old programs work on it or how I could mess it up. I tried to load windows 95

    it for kicks but I could get drives for my hardware. On Vista I have a Microsoft game pack dated 1994 that works great. The first machine my son and I built was a 8086. Don't laugh we were big time we had 2 5.25 floppy drives in it. Bring on Windows 7 I will see if I can mess it up.

    oldguy28

  4. Posted on: May 30, 2008 at 12:56AM  

    OK Brandon LeBlanc, I'm a new member here and have tried several times was wondering if there is some Keywords which are not suppose to be used reason why the post is not posting. I read others postings and mine still not there, started like...

    Well, it did practically read AT&T makes everything, I knew OSX was made by Apple and runs on Apple computers, nothing much different to iPhone but how could iPhone be any better a product if it cannot improve without losing its customers to another product down the road I see how iPhone is a impractical device for Electric Vehicles.

    [end of 1st sentence] I have not logged out, been quite busy away and still here, Vista keeping the site HOT!

  5. Posted on: May 30, 2008 at 6:12PM  

    Two things......first..I must say that one of my machines is running Vista SP1, and I have had no problem whatsoever, including games. I've been happy with it, and personally, now that I'm used to the Aero Glass feature, the screen looks very plain without it. More importantly, the system runs very well. Sure, it requires more power and a more potent geaphics card, but so do the new games that I play.

    Second.....it was mentioned that a new kernel is being developed for Windows 7. One thing myself and many other gamers would like to see is the 32 bit versions not having the low limit on system ram. 32 bit XP and Vista have the 3.32 gig limit on how much ram can be used, and most gamers are moving well beyond that, even now. At least an 8 gig limit for 32 bit systems would be nice, without being forced to go 64 bit, and deal with the added issues of finding drivers, etc.

    I'm surprised this limit with ram on 32 bit machines has still not been rectified, especially since more ram is now needed to run the OS anyway.

  6. Posted on: May 31, 2008 at 12:16AM  

    Clark1221, the 4Gb limit in 32-bit XP and Vista is not a Microsoft issue, it's a X86 architecture  limit. No matter how hard you try, you can't make a 32-bit OS that can handle more than 4Gb because is just plain impossible.

    That's what I've heard anyway.

    P.S. About you comment regarding gaming and Vista, I'm glad you have not had many problems but it is a widespread issue that games run slower in Vista than in XP... specially games made for Vista... like Halo 2 which was locked down as a Vista only title (god knows why) was running waaaaaay faster in XP (which some people got running with a simple patch). Also, Crysis runs a good %20 slower in Vista than XP and that's using a 9800GTX and a 3Ghz Core Duo.

    Maybe it's a GPU driver issue but looking around at benchmarks it seems that as a rule of thumb games do run slower in Vista.

  7. Posted on: May 31, 2008 at 1:24AM  

    The good news is that after being fed up with my Vista business upgrade, I did a clean install and it actually does run better.

    The bad news is that evidently, I can't perform a clean install with my Vista business upgrade dvd.  I can only upgrade.

    My mouth literally fell open at this stupidity.  Please tell me there's been a mistake that I can fix.  If not, please (for the sake of future Windows releases) tell me that everyone who was ever involved with Vista has quit, been fired or been kicked sideways.

    Anybody want to buy a Vista Business upgrade dvd for cheap?

  8. Posted on: May 31, 2008 at 10:59AM  

    I like Vista! I want Windows 7 to be more applicative so it can hibernate without shutting down and without being Virtualized. Systems monitoring is critical but automation is a design factor, suppose we want to drive slow instead of the speed limit, suppose we want to use arm signaling instead of blinkers, suppose we want to let other drivers know we have a real-time emergency before we encounter them and be posted on a highway sign so they can watch out for us heading that way. I mean if we cannot drive above 100 MPH we need some additions support out on the highway which indicates a emergency is occuring allow it to pass.

  9. Posted on: May 31, 2008 at 12:48PM  

    I have my problems with Vista, and still primarily  use xp pro. If anything I would like to see Microsoft really listen to feed back, I seen a lot of complaints in the beta of Vista, and I seen Microsoft ignore them to downright act condescending to anyone who complained about a feature or change. Microsoft seems to be listening more now, I just hope the trend continues. I do have to add, please allow more user customization, locking down the UI to the extent that Vista has is not user freindly.

  10. Posted on: May 31, 2008 at 1:25PM  

    Superpotato, "Why then is there a 64 bit version for a X86 architecture"? On this Dell Inspiron I found that it acknowledges it has Installed Physical Memory (RAM): 4.00 GB , Total Physical Memory: 3.18 GB , Available Physical Memory: 1.40 GB , Total Virtual Memory: 5.02 GB , Available Virtual Memory: 3.32 GB , Page File Space: 1.91 GB. It is running OS Name: Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium , Version: 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001. The Processor is AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+, 2300 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s). It is the 32 bit version but it upgrades to 64 bit and then the 4.00 GB limit is there as I have the memory installed for it.

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: GottaBeMobile on May 27, 2008 at 8:22AM
  2. Posted by: News on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the

  3. Posted by: ZenIT Blog on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Da qualche tempo in rete si sente parlare sempre più spesso di Windows 7 (quasi come contro altare

  4. Posted by: Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition on May 27, 2008 at 10:54AM

    The timing of this is a tad suspicious. Maybe this was planned weeks ago, as the start of a larger communications

  5. Posted by: Mark Lomas on May 27, 2008 at 11:12AM

    Microsoft learning from past mistakes?

  6. Posted by: Student Union on May 27, 2008 at 3:01PM
  7. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 7:11PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  8. Posted by: Heavy on the Technical on May 27, 2008 at 7:30PM

    For those who don't read the blogs/new we have a new OS on its way. The following comments/views do not

  9. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 10:46PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  10. Posted by: Technological Musings on May 28, 2008 at 11:32AM

    Well, looks like the early information on Windows 7 might be wrong.  According to an interview with Steven Sinofsky, Senior Vice President of Windows and Windows Live Engineering at Microsoft, there are a few details you may have heard that may not

  11. Posted by: Maarten van Stam - Soft As In Software :-) on May 28, 2008 at 7:46PM

    Windows Vista is done (ok, ok, some 'small' patchwork is needed to iron out the wrinkles). Ready for

  12. Posted by: The things that are better left unspoken on June 01, 2008 at 2:08PM

    All you need to know is... ... What you already know. In our society information is the greatest good.

  13. Posted by: meneame.net on June 02, 2008 at 10:53AM

    Chris Flores (director del equipo de Comunicaciones al Cliente de Microsoft) señala que una de las prioridades de Redmond en el desarrollo de Windows 7 es que este sea capaz de correr bien en cualquier PC que actualmente soporte Windows Vista. Visto en

  14. Posted by: SuperSite Blog on June 02, 2008 at 2:24PM

    If there's one thing Microsoft is doing poorly right now, it's communicating about Windows 7

  15. Posted by: Infosys | Microsoft on June 04, 2008 at 12:02AM

    What is Windows 7

  16. Posted by: windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends on January 08, 2009 at 9:19AM

    Pingback from  windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends

  17. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog on January 08, 2009 at 9:09PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog

  18. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  19. Posted by: Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 11:23PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista

  20. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 5:36AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  21. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  22. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  23. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  24. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 5:02AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  25. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  26. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 11, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  27. Posted by: Windows 7 public beta: First impressions on January 11, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 public beta: First impressions

  28. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 10:59PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  29. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 11:05PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  30. Posted by: Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home on January 12, 2009 at 4:59AM

    Pingback from  Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home

  31. Posted by: This Week???s Entertainment News on January 12, 2009 at 5:18AM

    Pingback from  This Week???s Entertainment News

  32. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  33. Posted by: Palm announces webOS and Pre phone on January 12, 2009 at 7:01AM

    Pingback from  Palm announces webOS and Pre phone

  34. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 12:55PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  35. Posted by: Scot???s Newsletter Blog » Blog Archive » More about Windows 7 Performance on February 04, 2009 at 6:50PM

    Pingback from  Scot???s Newsletter Blog  » Blog Archive   » More about Windows 7 Performance

  36. Posted by: Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso on February 06, 2009 at 9:32PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso

  37. Posted by: Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005 on May 03, 2009 at 7:27AM

    Pingback from  Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005

  38. Posted by: Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware on July 25, 2009 at 10:48PM

    Pingback from  Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware

  39. Posted by: Twitter Trackbacks for Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog [windowsteamblog.com] on Topsy.com on August 29, 2009 at 8:32AM

    Pingback from  Twitter Trackbacks for                 Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog         [windowsteamblog.com]        on Topsy.com