Communicating Windows 7

Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the next version-which begs two questions: 1) is Microsoft working on a new version of Windows, and if so, 2) why aren't you talking about it?

I thought I would spend a minute giving you an update on where we are. First, yes, we are working on a new version of Windows. As you likely know, it's called Windows 7.We are always looking for new ways to deliver great experiences for our customers.  This is especially true of Windows - where we're constantly examining trends in hardware, software and services to ensure that we continue to drive the innovation that has both made Windows the world's most popular operating system and has provided a foundation on which our partners built great products and businesses. When we shipped Windows 2000, we were already working on Windows XP and we started working on Windows Vista even before we released Windows XP. So naturally, we've been thinking about the investments we made in Windows Vista and how we can build on these for the next version of Windows.

What is a little different today is when and how we are talking about the next version of Windows.  So, why the change in approach?  We know that when we talk about our plans for the next release of Windows, people take action. As a result, we can significantly impact our partners and our customers if we broadly share information that later changes.  With Windows 7, we're trying to more carefully plan how we share information with our customers and partners.  This means sharing the right level of information at the right time depending on the needs of the audience.  For instance, several months ago we began privately sharing our preliminary plans for Windows 7 with software and hardware partners who build on the Windows platform.  This gave them an opportunity to give us feedback and gave us the opportunity to incorporate their input into our plans. As the product becomes more complete, we will have the opportunity to share our plans more broadly. Steven Sinofsky, Windows and Windows Live Engineering SVP, talks more about this in his interview with CNET's Ina Fried, published today: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-9951638-56.html.

We know that this is a change in our approach, but we are confident that it will help us not only to build even better products, but also to be more predictable in the delivery of our products. We also know that this change has led to some confusion, so we would like to share information today that will hopefully clear up some of this.

Before we talk about what's ahead, we should take a look at where we are today with Windows Vista.  From a quality perspective, both Windows Vista SP1 and the ecosystem have delivered measurable progress in the six dimensions of quality we track -- device compatibility, application compatibility, reliability, performance, battery life and security. The business results speak for themselves. As of March 31, we had sold more than 140 million Windows Vista licenses, and analyst firm forecasts indicate that Windows Vista adoption among businesses is on a similar pace as Windows XP in similar timeframes. Millions of enterprise users are already running Windows Vista, and we invite you to read their stories published in more than 100 case studies. The benefits they are experiencing range from energy conservation, lower TCO for mobile users, and greater security. Our job is not done, but we've worked hard with our ecosystem to improve the quality of Windows Vista and we're pleased with the customer response.

Another question we often get asked is whether Windows 7 is a major release. The answer is "yes"  -- it's hard to describe any product that is used by millions of people and worked on by thousands of engineers as anything else. That said, the long-term architectural investments we introduced in Windows Vista and then refined for Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 will carry forward in Windows 7. Windows Vista established a very solid foundation, particularly on subsystems such as graphics, audio, and storage. Windows Server 2008 was built on that foundation and Windows 7 will be as well. Contrary to some speculation, Microsoft is not creating a new kernel for Windows 7. Rather, we are refining the kernel architecture and componentization model introduced in Windows Vista.  While these changes will increase our engineering agility, they will not impact the user experience or reduce application or hardware compatibility. In fact, one of our design goals for Windows 7 is that it will run on the recommended hardware we specified for Windows Vista and that the applications and devices that work with Windows Vista will be compatible with Windows 7.

We are well into the development process of Windows 7, and we're happy to report that we're still on track to ship approximately three years after the general availability of Windows Vista. As always, we will be releasing early builds of Windows 7 prior to its general availability as a means to gain feedback, but we're not yet ready to discuss timing and specific plans for any Beta releases. In the meantime, customers can confidently continue with their Windows Vista deployment plans.


Comments

  1. Posted on: May 28, 2008 at 2:56AM  

    OS X is the operating system of iPhone made by AT&T for Apple. If iPhone is going to found faster modes the now sold out devices are not going to be able ready for consumers if AT&T grasps what compression and decompression of images mean to transmission speeds so there will have to be a different model which can interpret ImageX if that is what AT&T would consider. In all attempts to match the processing speed of a 64bit operating system iPhone may never break ground but there are possibilities that could be founded on the SD Memory card. One company Eye.Fi has a wireless capability on the 2GB Card and costs $129 making the computer auto sense the SD-HDD seems to be the only feasible option so ImageX operation could go into a card with the Wireless feature as well, its only a matter of time to originate a new phone onto the market. I mean Yahoo phone is something of the past as they commercially support Skype as well as that is a eBay company which eBay wants to sell.

  2. Posted on: May 28, 2008 at 4:25AM  

    For me Vista was a step back and i just use it for testing my own programs for compatibility reasons. My working environments are still Windows XP SP2 and OSX 10.5.

    I really hope the next version of windows will be less overloaded than Vista.

    Also a lot of the "security" questions are totally annoying - for example: starting most of my used programs i always get a window like "This is application is not certified by Microsoft - are you sure you want to start it?"

    I also dislike the current graphical user interface, because it is not a breakdown - so i always use "windows standard".

    Last but not least i hope that the next windows will be include 32 and 64 bit (like OSX) in one version unlike the current situation.

  3. Posted on: May 28, 2008 at 12:23PM  

    As far as I see it, Windows 7 is stepping in Vista's footsteps, which is the wrong type of footsteps to be stepping in.

    There are plenty of reasons as to why people haven't upgraded to Vista, and still wants XP support. The main reason is the system hog Vista became. The minimal requirements for Vista is only valid in an optimal environment, and lets face it, not many computers out there live up to those requirements.

    You also have other reasons, like who in their right minds would buy an operating system for such a stiff price, when the one they got now is working perfectly fine? Expecially when there is no real valid reason to upgrade except if they live in the dillusion that Vista is actually a fix to security. Windows, no matter what version, is and will always be a target, no security in an operating system is good enough that it can't be cracked, bypassed or exploited. If, or should I say when, gnu/linux or OSX takes off, which it will if Microsoft keeps up current trends, we will begin to see the same thing happening there.

    One of the biggest reasons why gnu/linux OS's and OSX hasn't made it big yet, is because of games. Microsoft has done well to secure that marked, and it's big. Games are resource hogs as well, so no sane gamer will ever upgrade to a cluttered, DRM filled, "fancy graphics" operated OS that only has a promise of breaking games. Plenty of people voiced their concern about Vistas requirements when they were released, Windows 7 seems only to do the same.

    As for businesses, unless they are supported by Microsoft with cheap deals or cooperation, or microsoft takes them over in a more hostile manner, pushing for their product, then there is no sane businessman who would go for a heavy system when they can have a cheaper/free system which doesnt require a small nuke plant to run.

    I do see the point for Microsoft to push Vista and 7 into the future, but your doing it wrong. Haven't you learned yet? As user254 says: Windows Vista is the biggest mistake since ME.

    What you should be working on is a user friendly, CLEAN, modular and low memory print OS. We don't care about paint getting touch-screen useability or watching water ripples as the mouse fly across the screen, or having fancy transparent windows (which looks aweful in my opinion). We want an OS that we can control.. which means people have easy access to shut on and off all types of things from a list. Stop pushing on stuff we don't want.

    This is the exact reason I like XP. It's fairly clean right out of the box. Some shutdowns of useless XP features in services (which is a bit hidden unless your a tech-savvy person), and XP runs like clockwork. Some external anti-viruses and such, which is required since no windows version will ever be secure, no matter how much you try to convince us, and I got the OS I love. Clean, user friendly, no bullshit.

    Trust me, if you don't alter your approach on windows 7 now, and fix your stuff, then the year windows 7 comes out will be the year gnu/linux and OSX OS's start coming into play bigtime.

  4. Posted on: May 28, 2008 at 12:35PM  

    I've read that Windows 7 will include virtualization.  I hope it's to a higher degree than simply including Virtual PC as an added application.  Honestly, we users (and the folks that support them), want to run our applications.  We don't care that our OS has snazzy graphics/animations, gizmos, gadgets and what not that only suck resources preventing our applications to run smoothly.  It's less about the OS and more about what we can run on it - IMHO.  Just ask the legions of XP supporters and they'll say the same thing...

  5. Posted on: May 28, 2008 at 3:28PM  

    This feels some kind of old and and some how stolen. And by the way, AT&T didn't develop the OS for iPhone. The OS in iPhone is Mac OS X in a stripped version.

  6. Posted on: May 28, 2008 at 3:45PM  

    Chris I'm sorry I thank you for confirming the rumors I've heard about Windows 7 but to be honest I have to say that as a 20 Year PC user dating back to DOS and one who remembers using the original Windows 1.0 you cannot convince me that this pre press release of Windows 7 does not mean the death of Windows Vista.  If people remember there history correctly Windows 3.1 was truly outdated from a software and hardware aspect when Windows 95 was first released and Windows 98 which came out a few years later was not a new OS but was truly an upgrade of Windows 95 albeit much more stable / faster.  However when Windows ME came out right on the heals of Windows 2000 (which was the first OS from Microsoft not built on DOS) it was a total flop and a lot of consumers lost money (including myself) as they would have been better off staying with Windows 98 until the release of Windows XP unless they were a business user and could have benefited from upgrading to Windows 2000 from 98 which is not a true product lineage since Windows NT was the workstation / network version that users would have more than likely upgraded from in a business environment.  Windows ME should have never happened.  Windows 98 SE was the most stable fastest performing OS Microsoft had released and had enough software / hardware compatibility to carrier it well into 2002 when XP was first released without the insanity known as Window ME.  I feel like we are in the same boat again as consumers and in my case an IT professional with Windows Vista.  Windows XP Professional SP2 is rock solid stable and super-fast on today's PC's where as even the latest top of the line PC struggles with Vista to the point where I've had PC's with Quad Core processors, 512 MB Graphic Cards and 4 GB of memory that still performed slower in basic task than a computer running half of those specs on an XP Box.  So without sounding like a conspiracy theorist I honestly believe that these "interim" releases like Windows ME and now Windows Vista are really using the publics funds as test beds to tweak and hammer out issues before the real OS comes out.  i have no doubt that Windows 7 will be a great OS in the tradition of Windows 98 SE and Windows XP Pro SP2 but I just wish it had not been out our expense again as with Windows ME; Windows Vista should have never been released XP could have lasted with SP3 for several more years until 7 was ready for release.  Just my humble take sorry!  

  7. Posted on: May 28, 2008 at 4:38PM  

    "applications and devices that work with Windows Vista will be compatible with Windows 7"

    You mean the hundreds of millions of users running XP (mostly because Vista sucks) won't be able to upgrade to Windows 7 either?  Thanks for nothing, and in case you haven't noticed the vast majority of enterprise customers are NOT upgrading to Vista due to instability, performance and compatibility issues Microsoft apears to be ignoring.

    A lot of my legacy applications run just fine under XP Pro SP3, but won't run under Vista (any flavor) and the few that do have so many performance and stability issues with little in the way of compelling new features to make it worth my time to recommend upgrading my enterprise to Vista.  The huge cost of hardware upgrades, software upgrades, driver updates added to the amount of work required to get it to work right for the reward of... what?  Slower performance, unstable TCP/IP stack, hardware incompatibility and that annoying block or allow box popping up all day long?  

    I've got an enterprise to support and we don't see enough reward to go through the type of thorough overhaul of our infrastructure necessary to implement Vista, not to mention the huge cost in lost productivity once Vista is running on our workstations.

    IT'S TOO SLOW.

    If Microsoft is serious about "delivering great experiences" for their customers, they would release their new OS that was more compatible with their customer's needs and existing environment.  Microsoft seems only committed to helping their business partner's bottom line (ie: buy new hardware, buy new software and change your network) The customers who have gone through this painful and hugely expensive process wake up the morning after only to find out Vista is considerably slower and less stable than XP.  Talk about regret.  Most of them are asking the question: "Why did we do this?"

    Microsoft's answer is the same canned answer they have been giving us since Windows 98: "It's more stable.  It's more secure.  It's better."

    Doesn't sound like Microsoft listens to their "customers" at all if Windows 7 is only going to be a mutated version of Vista.

  8. Posted on: May 29, 2008 at 12:14AM  

    Well, it did practically read AT&T makes everything, I knew OSX was made by Apple and runs on Apple computers, nothing much different to iPhone but how could iPhone be any better a product if it cannot improve without losing its customers to another product down the road I see how iPhone is a impractical device for Electric Vehicles. Sure set programming cannot be hibernated, its a on/off matter like iPhone is so a upgrade does change nothing as the same buttonry and architecture is still doing the same old sorting routines and this is a bad oman for AT&T whom goes on what Apple tells them to do and nothing extra so AT&T really cannot input anything which would make much difference. So I wouldn't want iPhone in a Electric Vehicle at all and what I would want is a built-in much similar to the Lexus LS600H made in Japan, it is a handsfree with a possible remote headset but offers a extra punch for security in case of tampering or theft it can auto dial security having preaccessed GPS [Lexus Link Advisor]. The Lexus LS600H was recently purchased by Paul McCartney, More About Here: http://webpages.charter.net/cmjaltx/docs/LexLS600H/LexLS600H.html.

    Elaborating further by showing that Electric Vechicle computing is still waiting for programming specialists (Wheres Microsoft In Development) that know how to use ImageX (WIM) and when it should be used.

    Time of day traffic analysis reveals that certain aspects would be evident during certain times of day and this would become a stored (WIM) to access during that time of day. During certain times of the day it might be advisable not to recharge the vehicle, power companies need to do a study per neighborhood served during certain times of day to define the load characteristics to consumers so that they could recognize this in their program, else a data input resulting from a monitored load coming from the power company needs to be received through their power grid into the system program so that the Electric Vehicle could instruct you if the time was a good time or a bad time to recharge the vehicle. Loads increase during extra moments where torque and horsepower is needed such as climbing a hill or pulling a object.

    ImageX (WIM) is a principle to create special discs of the HDD space which contains a operating system so the disc becomes a installation disc and ImageX (WIM) has command line options. ImageX does not have anyother feather, learn about ImageX here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsvista/aa905116.aspx

    Windows Vista has a API for the WIM image format called WIMGAPI and developers use it to work with WIM image files based on disk imaging. WIM image format enhanced Windows Vista.

    In design of ImageX developers never have considered another purpose for it and that is how a new hibernation feature could be a major improvement in Windows 7 and for Communications. I recommend Microsoft to study this proposition further.

  9. Posted on: May 29, 2008 at 12:27AM  

    I hate that Vista works as well as it does. I hate that I never have to restart my laptop. I hate that Vista runs all the programs I need quickly and without any problems. I hate that I don't worry about security with Vista. I hate that I can plan on Vista to always work. I hate that I am more productive with Vista. I hate that everything I need is so easy to get to with Vista.

    What a wonderful upgrade Vista is over XP.

    God, Microsoft can you stop innovating and making things better. You are really making my computing experience better and I can't have that.

    I am running Vista Ultimate on a new Dell laptop and a P4 system with 2GB of ram and both systems work very well.

    I will say that DreamScene with Ultimate doesn't make much sense to me.

    I am exceited to see Windows become even more modular.

  10. Siv
    Posted on: May 29, 2008 at 9:04AM  

    Glad to hear that MS are getting the message about what will be in Win7 straight before talking about it publicly. All that happened not doing that about Longhorn was that you created a lot of disappointment as each touted feature was removed.

    As an IT Consultant, developer and a user who has used MS Operating systems since DOS 3 that I think you should get the following things right:

    1. Performance on current modest hardware, this may be by making the system modular so that a user or IT department can add or remove features that would excessively slow a system that the user is prepared to live without. E.g. being able to turn off the Aero effects such as transparency like you can currently do but additionally being able to remove chunks of the system that you don't need such as the multimedia aspects that probably aren't needed in a business setting where the machine is just used for email spreadsheets and word processing.

    2. Don't listen to all the Mac OSX crap, a good deal of Windows users couldn't give a flying f*ck whether Mac OSX looks prettier than Windows or is "cooler", most of us prefer boring if it works faster and lets us achieve what we wan't before we go home for the day. Let the air heads continue to buy Macs we don't want them here!

    3. Get rid of UAC, it doesn't work as a security mechanism as within about a day of paying attention to it the average user is automatically hitting the "OK allow" button without even reading what it says. It causes so many other applications to break in the background it becomes a nightmare to troubleshoot what is causing programs to fail or behave strangely. It would be much better to apply heuristic techniques like most anti-spyware programs and decide whether an application or script is doing something dangerous and only block its activity under those circumstances.

    4. Don't change things for the sake of change, e.g. why change "Add or Remove Programs" to be "Programs And Features" why change the order of tick boxes in the tick list of features in the start menu configuration, it's pointless and causes seasoned users to waste time and thus productivity having to relearn where evrything is! Sure add new functionality but keep the paradigm the same so it's easy for users and support people to remain productive.

    5. Keep the Win7 product line simple:

    Win7 Home

    Win7 Business

    Win7 Ultimate

    6. Make it cheap to upgrade:

    Win7 Home £50 boxed and £25 OEM

    Win7 Business £80 boxed, £40 OEM

    Win7 Ultimate £100 boxed, £50 OEM

    (For US readers double numbers for $ value)

    Do this and you have a winner, do not and you'll lose the user base to Linux and Mac.

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: GottaBeMobile on May 27, 2008 at 8:22AM
  2. Posted by: News on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the

  3. Posted by: ZenIT Blog on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Da qualche tempo in rete si sente parlare sempre più spesso di Windows 7 (quasi come contro altare

  4. Posted by: Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition on May 27, 2008 at 10:54AM

    The timing of this is a tad suspicious. Maybe this was planned weeks ago, as the start of a larger communications

  5. Posted by: Mark Lomas on May 27, 2008 at 11:12AM

    Microsoft learning from past mistakes?

  6. Posted by: Student Union on May 27, 2008 at 3:01PM
  7. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 7:11PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  8. Posted by: Heavy on the Technical on May 27, 2008 at 7:30PM

    For those who don't read the blogs/new we have a new OS on its way. The following comments/views do not

  9. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 10:46PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  10. Posted by: Technological Musings on May 28, 2008 at 11:32AM

    Well, looks like the early information on Windows 7 might be wrong.  According to an interview with Steven Sinofsky, Senior Vice President of Windows and Windows Live Engineering at Microsoft, there are a few details you may have heard that may not

  11. Posted by: Maarten van Stam - Soft As In Software :-) on May 28, 2008 at 7:46PM

    Windows Vista is done (ok, ok, some 'small' patchwork is needed to iron out the wrinkles). Ready for

  12. Posted by: The things that are better left unspoken on June 01, 2008 at 2:08PM

    All you need to know is... ... What you already know. In our society information is the greatest good.

  13. Posted by: meneame.net on June 02, 2008 at 10:53AM

    Chris Flores (director del equipo de Comunicaciones al Cliente de Microsoft) señala que una de las prioridades de Redmond en el desarrollo de Windows 7 es que este sea capaz de correr bien en cualquier PC que actualmente soporte Windows Vista. Visto en

  14. Posted by: SuperSite Blog on June 02, 2008 at 2:24PM

    If there's one thing Microsoft is doing poorly right now, it's communicating about Windows 7

  15. Posted by: Infosys | Microsoft on June 04, 2008 at 12:02AM

    What is Windows 7

  16. Posted by: windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends on January 08, 2009 at 9:19AM

    Pingback from  windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends

  17. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog on January 08, 2009 at 9:09PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog

  18. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  19. Posted by: Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 11:23PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista

  20. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 5:36AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  21. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  22. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  23. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  24. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 5:02AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  25. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  26. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 11, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  27. Posted by: Windows 7 public beta: First impressions on January 11, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 public beta: First impressions

  28. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 10:59PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  29. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 11:05PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  30. Posted by: Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home on January 12, 2009 at 4:59AM

    Pingback from  Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home

  31. Posted by: This Week???s Entertainment News on January 12, 2009 at 5:18AM

    Pingback from  This Week???s Entertainment News

  32. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  33. Posted by: Palm announces webOS and Pre phone on January 12, 2009 at 7:01AM

    Pingback from  Palm announces webOS and Pre phone

  34. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 12:55PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  35. Posted by: Scot???s Newsletter Blog » Blog Archive » More about Windows 7 Performance on February 04, 2009 at 6:50PM

    Pingback from  Scot???s Newsletter Blog  » Blog Archive   » More about Windows 7 Performance

  36. Posted by: Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso on February 06, 2009 at 9:32PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso

  37. Posted by: Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005 on May 03, 2009 at 7:27AM

    Pingback from  Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005

  38. Posted by: Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware on July 25, 2009 at 10:48PM

    Pingback from  Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware

  39. Posted by: Twitter Trackbacks for Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog [windowsteamblog.com] on Topsy.com on August 29, 2009 at 8:32AM

    Pingback from  Twitter Trackbacks for                 Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog         [windowsteamblog.com]        on Topsy.com