Communicating Windows 7

Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the next version-which begs two questions: 1) is Microsoft working on a new version of Windows, and if so, 2) why aren't you talking about it?

I thought I would spend a minute giving you an update on where we are. First, yes, we are working on a new version of Windows. As you likely know, it's called Windows 7.We are always looking for new ways to deliver great experiences for our customers.  This is especially true of Windows - where we're constantly examining trends in hardware, software and services to ensure that we continue to drive the innovation that has both made Windows the world's most popular operating system and has provided a foundation on which our partners built great products and businesses. When we shipped Windows 2000, we were already working on Windows XP and we started working on Windows Vista even before we released Windows XP. So naturally, we've been thinking about the investments we made in Windows Vista and how we can build on these for the next version of Windows.

What is a little different today is when and how we are talking about the next version of Windows.  So, why the change in approach?  We know that when we talk about our plans for the next release of Windows, people take action. As a result, we can significantly impact our partners and our customers if we broadly share information that later changes.  With Windows 7, we're trying to more carefully plan how we share information with our customers and partners.  This means sharing the right level of information at the right time depending on the needs of the audience.  For instance, several months ago we began privately sharing our preliminary plans for Windows 7 with software and hardware partners who build on the Windows platform.  This gave them an opportunity to give us feedback and gave us the opportunity to incorporate their input into our plans. As the product becomes more complete, we will have the opportunity to share our plans more broadly. Steven Sinofsky, Windows and Windows Live Engineering SVP, talks more about this in his interview with CNET's Ina Fried, published today: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-9951638-56.html.

We know that this is a change in our approach, but we are confident that it will help us not only to build even better products, but also to be more predictable in the delivery of our products. We also know that this change has led to some confusion, so we would like to share information today that will hopefully clear up some of this.

Before we talk about what's ahead, we should take a look at where we are today with Windows Vista.  From a quality perspective, both Windows Vista SP1 and the ecosystem have delivered measurable progress in the six dimensions of quality we track -- device compatibility, application compatibility, reliability, performance, battery life and security. The business results speak for themselves. As of March 31, we had sold more than 140 million Windows Vista licenses, and analyst firm forecasts indicate that Windows Vista adoption among businesses is on a similar pace as Windows XP in similar timeframes. Millions of enterprise users are already running Windows Vista, and we invite you to read their stories published in more than 100 case studies. The benefits they are experiencing range from energy conservation, lower TCO for mobile users, and greater security. Our job is not done, but we've worked hard with our ecosystem to improve the quality of Windows Vista and we're pleased with the customer response.

Another question we often get asked is whether Windows 7 is a major release. The answer is "yes"  -- it's hard to describe any product that is used by millions of people and worked on by thousands of engineers as anything else. That said, the long-term architectural investments we introduced in Windows Vista and then refined for Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 will carry forward in Windows 7. Windows Vista established a very solid foundation, particularly on subsystems such as graphics, audio, and storage. Windows Server 2008 was built on that foundation and Windows 7 will be as well. Contrary to some speculation, Microsoft is not creating a new kernel for Windows 7. Rather, we are refining the kernel architecture and componentization model introduced in Windows Vista.  While these changes will increase our engineering agility, they will not impact the user experience or reduce application or hardware compatibility. In fact, one of our design goals for Windows 7 is that it will run on the recommended hardware we specified for Windows Vista and that the applications and devices that work with Windows Vista will be compatible with Windows 7.

We are well into the development process of Windows 7, and we're happy to report that we're still on track to ship approximately three years after the general availability of Windows Vista. As always, we will be releasing early builds of Windows 7 prior to its general availability as a means to gain feedback, but we're not yet ready to discuss timing and specific plans for any Beta releases. In the meantime, customers can confidently continue with their Windows Vista deployment plans.


Comments

  1. Posted on: May 27, 2008 at 12:24PM  

    Hi Chris,

    Just wanted to say that this is probably the best approach. I think what really had "doomed" Vista in the public's eyes was that there were many promises early on that ended up not being met as the product needed to ship. That's not to say Vista is a bad product itself, it's just not what people expected after they were promised certain features.

    Hopefully we see quite a few new features when Windows 7 hits, and hopefully some of them are more on the technical front than in the past.

    I've enjoyed the changes to things such as GPMC in Server 2008 and have a pretty good expectation on what to hopefully see in Windows 7.

    Good luck!

  2. Posted on: May 27, 2008 at 1:30PM  

    i have a small question

    now this blog in future convert in Windows 7 blog or microsoft create a new Blog??

  3. Posted on: May 27, 2008 at 2:19PM  
  4. Posted on: May 27, 2008 at 2:29PM  

    I don't know where to send a feedback for Vista Ultimate extras I've been using Desk Drive "free to anyone" for a few days now and like it but the drawback is the memory usage. Something similar to desk drive as ultimate extras would be nice.

    Desk Drive: Desk Drive adds a desktop icon pointing to the drive automatically. Remove the media and the shortcut goes away. http://blueonionsoftware.com/deskdrive.aspx

  5. Posted on: May 27, 2008 at 3:47PM  

    JUST MAKE IT SOLID!

  6. Posted on: May 27, 2008 at 4:24PM  

    Speaking of major and minor releases, I always felt XP was an absolutely major release with thousands of fine improvements and tweaks over Windows 2000. I'm a die hard fan of Microsoft products ever since I started my stint with Windows 95 and I'm dying to beta test Windows 7, but I guess it's too late now? I wasn't accepted into the Longhorn betas and was extremely disappointed and sad. I know that I must be 1 in a million people wanting to test it but I can really test it comprehensively and give quality feedback since I know Windows in and out and contribute regularly to Wikipedia articles. So my question is are there any hopes for invites in early betas before the product is code/feature complete?

  7. Posted on: May 27, 2008 at 11:13PM  

    While I appreciate that Microsoft has always pushed innovation and change forward in its operating systems, here is one major-four step-flaw I find in it's architecture:

    Step 1)  Release New operating system

    Step 2)  Take years to bring compatibility to the average person (aka, most of the population of the world that isn't tech-savvy.  There's more than you think & I help them every day with every blue screen and Windows crash!)

    Step 3)  Make the operating system practically perfect and running without barely any problems

    Step 4)  Release new operating system practically right after previous operating system becomes nearly-perfect, thus continuing a battle for compatibility and "making x program/application/game run"

    Windows 98 was practically perfect, until programs and applications became specifically written for XP, then everyone 'had' to move to XP (skip Windows ME, it was in the line with 98), which didn't work with everything ironically enough.

    The same is happening with Vista, XP is practically perfect, but programs are being specifically written for Vista now, but at the same time compatibility is limited.

    On another note, I work in the Tech industry, and the everyday user is complaining so much about Vista it's becoming a selling point for purchasing a Mac.  I see and hear more of this every day.

    Microsoft, please stop basing your decisions off of "numbers" and your sales, and listen to the average user which should be your largest market.  Not only is Windows Vista losing current (and long-term!) customers to Apple, once they move to Apple it will be twice as difficult to convince them to make the move back.

  8. Posted on: May 27, 2008 at 11:14PM  

    On a lighter note, I do enjoy Windows Vista and a number of its features, but that is because I am a Tech that knows how to work around its flaws.

  9. Posted on: May 28, 2008 at 1:48AM  

    In a new operating system shouldn't Microsoft swing towards a more capable real mode of handling memory than serving hidden aspects of Virtualization so to use without restarting a hibernation of certain running apps and system defaults that are not necessary such as icons and then use ImageX (WIM format) for compressing a range of photos to send instead of sending photo per photo. If this were the case I feel faster communications for wireless phones would result in their hibernation mode sending the ImageX (WIM) would not have to have use of the programming aspects to select photo by photo and wait for a time span per photo to occur to complete another send. If I were to make a program control aspect depend on a memory sequence ImageX would be my first choice to store the running programs so to restart simply by uncompressing the ImageX (WIM). If this is not understood by you please explain why. Why then is Windows 7 not a compelling operating system to engage this sort of control over the software in use including all and parts of Windows 7. If we were using this principle within a camera which could transmit photos, the (WIM) would be transmitted not the photo per photo principle where we are at today with digital products, a SD Memory Card would be capable of handling any file format so theres really no limit of how many photos and (WIM) setups stored could be zapped up into a file to sent. If trying to found a new aspect like hologram communication this principle would be a major drive matter. It is superior to Virtualization so don't tell me you cannot give consumers what they should be paying for. Make communications programming that can be universal per phone being served don't depend on the majority to guide your insight of how programming should be created when the majority is nothing like this whatsoever, if you want to send one photo just don't click the hibernate button which runs your selected program options and it sends one photo which would be a default value, a button expedities the hibernation sequence shutting down what is not necessary to store a ImageX (WIM) and then sends the ImageX (WIM) that pure and deletion of the ImageX (WIM) after sent would be possible or you can resend the ImageX (WIM) again to a different phone. Why waste time having to recreate a ImageX (WIM).

  10. Posted on: May 28, 2008 at 2:31AM  

    In other words:

    "We still have no word from Apple about the features in OS X 10.6, so we have no idea what we're going to try to copy for Windows 7"

    namaste.

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: GottaBeMobile on May 27, 2008 at 8:22AM
  2. Posted by: News on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Typically when Microsoft ships a new OS (like Windows Vista), we immediately start talking about the

  3. Posted by: ZenIT Blog on May 27, 2008 at 10:26AM

    Da qualche tempo in rete si sente parlare sempre più spesso di Windows 7 (quasi come contro altare

  4. Posted by: Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition on May 27, 2008 at 10:54AM

    The timing of this is a tad suspicious. Maybe this was planned weeks ago, as the start of a larger communications

  5. Posted by: Mark Lomas on May 27, 2008 at 11:12AM

    Microsoft learning from past mistakes?

  6. Posted by: Student Union on May 27, 2008 at 3:01PM
  7. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 7:11PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  8. Posted by: Heavy on the Technical on May 27, 2008 at 7:30PM

    For those who don't read the blogs/new we have a new OS on its way. The following comments/views do not

  9. Posted by: TechBlog on May 27, 2008 at 10:46PM

    In my Computing column today, I attempted to answer a question that I'm hearing from a lot of Windows users: Should they make the move to Vista today, or hold off for Windows 7? After painting a picture of what's...

  10. Posted by: Technological Musings on May 28, 2008 at 11:32AM

    Well, looks like the early information on Windows 7 might be wrong.  According to an interview with Steven Sinofsky, Senior Vice President of Windows and Windows Live Engineering at Microsoft, there are a few details you may have heard that may not

  11. Posted by: Maarten van Stam - Soft As In Software :-) on May 28, 2008 at 7:46PM

    Windows Vista is done (ok, ok, some 'small' patchwork is needed to iron out the wrinkles). Ready for

  12. Posted by: The things that are better left unspoken on June 01, 2008 at 2:08PM

    All you need to know is... ... What you already know. In our society information is the greatest good.

  13. Posted by: meneame.net on June 02, 2008 at 10:53AM

    Chris Flores (director del equipo de Comunicaciones al Cliente de Microsoft) señala que una de las prioridades de Redmond en el desarrollo de Windows 7 es que este sea capaz de correr bien en cualquier PC que actualmente soporte Windows Vista. Visto en

  14. Posted by: SuperSite Blog on June 02, 2008 at 2:24PM

    If there's one thing Microsoft is doing poorly right now, it's communicating about Windows 7

  15. Posted by: Infosys | Microsoft on June 04, 2008 at 12:02AM

    What is Windows 7

  16. Posted by: windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends on January 08, 2009 at 9:19AM

    Pingback from  windows 7 | Latest Breaking News Trends

  17. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog on January 08, 2009 at 9:09PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource-hog than Vista | Orb Computers Blog

  18. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  19. Posted by: Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista on January 09, 2009 at 11:23PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7: Less of a Resource-Hog Than Vista

  20. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 5:36AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  21. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  22. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  23. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 10, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  24. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 5:02AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  25. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 6:57AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  26. Posted by: Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive? on January 11, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Top Tip: Disappearing disc drive?

  27. Posted by: Windows 7 public beta: First impressions on January 11, 2009 at 10:57PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 public beta: First impressions

  28. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 10:59PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  29. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 11, 2009 at 11:05PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  30. Posted by: Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home on January 12, 2009 at 4:59AM

    Pingback from  Do-it-yourself 3D movies at home

  31. Posted by: This Week???s Entertainment News on January 12, 2009 at 5:18AM

    Pingback from  This Week???s Entertainment News

  32. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 6:58AM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  33. Posted by: Palm announces webOS and Pre phone on January 12, 2009 at 7:01AM

    Pingback from  Palm announces webOS and Pre phone

  34. Posted by: Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista on January 12, 2009 at 12:55PM

    Pingback from  Windows 7 is less of a resource hog than Vista

  35. Posted by: Scot???s Newsletter Blog » Blog Archive » More about Windows 7 Performance on February 04, 2009 at 6:50PM

    Pingback from  Scot???s Newsletter Blog  » Blog Archive   » More about Windows 7 Performance

  36. Posted by: Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso on February 06, 2009 at 9:32PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Comeback Or - Nail In The Coffin :: TechMiso

  37. Posted by: Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005 on May 03, 2009 at 7:27AM

    Pingback from  Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!, 2005

  38. Posted by: Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware on July 25, 2009 at 10:48PM

    Pingback from  Audio mal instalado de windows 7 :-( - Foro de Spyware

  39. Posted by: Twitter Trackbacks for Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog [windowsteamblog.com] on Topsy.com on August 29, 2009 at 8:32AM

    Pingback from  Twitter Trackbacks for                 Communicating Windows 7 - Windows Vista Team Blog - The Windows Blog         [windowsteamblog.com]        on Topsy.com