Non-security update rolls out Tuesday

Tomorrow, Tuesday 8 January, we are releasing several non-security update packages via Windows Update.  The updates include the regular monthly Malicious Software Removal Tool and Windows Mail Junk Mail Filter, two updates in our regular series of Windows Vista updates (KB943302 for application compatibility and KB943899 for reliability and performance), and one update of particular notice: KB935509.  Similar to previous updates that enhanced Windows Vista’s performance and reliability, these updates will be distributed automatically through Windows Update.

Tomorrow’s KB935509 release is a little different than past updates.  It is a prerequisite for installing SP1 and is applicable only for Windows Vista Ultimate and Enterprise users, because it only affects versions of Windows Vista supporting BitLocker Drive Encryption.

This update modifies the boot loader to enable successful install or uninstall of the service pack if the PC uses BitLocker encryption.  We’re releasing it now to lay the groundwork for future updates and to eliminate any extra reboots by installing it along with updates that already require a reboot.  For more information on the update, see KB article KB935509 (which will be posted on Tuesday morning).

In addition to KB985509, there are two other updates that will be prerequisites for Windows Vista SP1, for all versions of Windows Vista.  They will be released at a later date and will improve the installation experience and reliability for the service pack as well as for individual update packages.

SP1 development and testing efforts are continuing as expected and we remain on track for its release later this quarter.


Comments

  1. Posted on: January 10, 2008 at 8:33PM  

    Hey sararocs:  an update that fails to install could have many underlying causes, but in the end, such a problem may be an indicator of a more serious issue.  You should contact Customer Support at http://support.microsoft.com and use the 'chat' or 'email' links to try to resolve this issue.  Unfortunately, this blog is not equipped to provide technical support.  Good luck!

  2. Posted on: January 10, 2008 at 8:54PM  

    I just (an hour or so ago) had update KB935509 installed per very insistent suggestion of my machine (running Vista Ultimate). After all, I thought I'd be a compliant MS customer and have automatic updates done: why not?

    My box is a brand-new (well, it's really ~6 months old) Fujitsu N6460 notebook with a 64 bit dual-core Intel processor and 4GB of ram. This would be an awfully expensive paperweight, so I have a real incentive to avoid further problems regarding these automatic updates.

    I'm not running anything fancier than Vista, Norton Internet Security, MS Office.

    Next thing I know, I can't start windows normally and I get to go through some process to roll things back. I'm actually relatively thankful that this was done without me having to know anything, because I sure don't. However, I'd really rather not have mandated updates make my machine unusable, either!

    According to my event viewer, the relevant

    error ID is 0x80242016. I'll note that about 15 updates have been done, since last October, all without incident.

    I don't want to be a pest, but WTF?

    Of course, my machine is now suggesting

    once again that this update be installed.

    ... do I feel lucky? Should I?

  3. Posted on: January 10, 2008 at 8:57PM  

    Re: my just-finished rant.

    Oops, I just noticed your remark that this blog don't do tech support. My apologies for the error, I'll dash over there to get things done.

  4. Posted on: January 11, 2008 at 12:35AM  

    KB935509 failed to install several times.

    I have two harddisks. Disk A I have Vista, Suse 6.3 Linux and Grub-bootloader. This is my normal boot-disk and startup configuration. I have drive B where is XP and Vista own bootloader for XP-Vista (Vista is still on disk A) selection. Today I boot from drive B and KB935509 installed without problems.

    I select drive A again to my boot-disk and Vista started well. Good, but I wonder what happens to SP1-installation when available. Maybe KB935509 makes something to bootloader and that modification is now on wrong disk.

  5. Posted on: January 11, 2008 at 12:53AM  

    Hey wdhall:  sorry to hear that your installation didn't go well.  While I cannot help toubleshoot, I have relayed your situation to our Windows Update team for investigation -- thanks for taking the time to share the circumstances.

  6. Posted on: January 12, 2008 at 12:16AM  

    Hi: none of the 5 updates released on Jan 8th are installing. My thinkpad T61p on Vista32 business reboots constantly, tries to update then shuts down, then restarts and shows failed updates. Every day it tries again and this is driving me nuts. All updates have installed without any problem to date, so I think this block of updates have a bug in the install process. Am I the only one impacted by the problem?

    Thanks

    Nick

  7. Posted on: January 12, 2008 at 1:33AM  

    Hey nicho: we're unable to provide tech support via this blog, but I've relayed your situation to the Windows Update team.  I'd suggest visiting one of our public newsgroups for assistance.

  8. Posted on: January 14, 2008 at 4:30AM  

    Thanks Nick.  Appreciate the link. Will Post comments there.

  9. Posted on: January 14, 2008 at 2:05PM  

    Sorry if this is not the place but I am so frustrated with this OS that I got to a point that I have to complain with someone that actually worked on it. Nothing works. And when it does it is very slow.

    But the funny thing is that you write: "we’re first and foremost focused on delivering a high-quality release, so we'll determine the exact release date of SP1 after we have reached that quality bar.". Nick, let me tell you a secret. ANYTHING you release at this point will be better than what you have.

    I wonder how billg is handling that? I would be cutting heads like crazy.

    My next computer will be a Mac... There is no way I will upgrade from XP to Vista. By the way, love XP with SP2 and Office 2007. Maybe you should put the people from Office to work fixing Vista.

    Take care.

  10. Posted on: January 14, 2008 at 4:29PM  

    Hey, is there an official place to report Vista bugs?

    Vista's Explorer doesn't .cur files correctly in its thumbnail display, even the ones shipped with Vista.  For example, in C:\Windows\Cursors look at "cross_r.cur" or "arrow_i.cur", it's rendering a random stock Vista cursor image instead.   Property page preview is also wrong, although the mask loads fine. Load them in Visual Studio to see what the image is suposed to be.  

    It's very bizzare.. something a developer only would notice.  It's killing me since I work in UI and the display is wrong for all of our cursor.

    Anyways, I've love to log the bug through "Connect" but Vista is not there.

  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: The Official Blog of the SBS "Diva" on January 07, 2008 at 10:55PM

    The first of the Vista sp1 prelims will be out tomorrow: Windows Vista Team Blog : Non-security update

  2. Posted by: MVPs on January 07, 2008 at 11:05PM

    The first of the Vista sp1 prelims will be out tomorrow: Windows Vista Team Blog : Non-security update

  3. Posted by: WSUS Product Team Blog on January 07, 2008 at 11:18PM

    WSUS Admins, Happy New Year!! I wanted to provide some guidance on the prerequisite update (KB935509)

  4. Posted by: Microsoft Update Product Team Blog on January 08, 2008 at 11:43AM

    Hi all, Just dropping a quick line to let you know about one of the updates we're releasing this week

  5. Posted by: Realtime Community | Windows Server on January 11, 2008 at 10:58AM

    One of the three prerequisites for the Vista SP1 upgrade is available now. According to the Vista team blog, KB935509, the first of these, "modifies the boot loader to enable successful install or uninstall of the service pack if the PC uses BitLocker