Welcome to The Windows Blog 


Keeping it real

In a recent post to his blog, Alex Kochis, Senior Product Manager for Windows Genuine Advantage, discusses the on-going work on anti-piracy features incorporated into many of the products Microsoft releases.  Part of the job is to communicate advances that keep pace with those of pirates, so his team has updated their How to Tell website -- a site dedicated to helping customers tell whether their MS software is legitimate.  The site's updated look-and-feel can take advantage of higher screen resolutions; a further addition is an RSS feed to inform customers of changes to anti-piracy features in our products.

Alex also mentions the story behind the holography on Windows Vista DVD's (and other Microsoft product media), which we covered last month.  The technology is called edge-to-edge holography and consists of a variety of objects embedded into the holograms integrated into product media, designed to help prove legitimacy of products consumers may purchase from various sources.  Our story on the three men depicted in a microscopic photo on the Windows Vista DVD is an example of this technology.

If you've not visited the How To Tell site, I think you'll find it entertaining as well as eye-opening:  entertaining because of what some people try to pass off as legitimate MS products, and eye-opening because other pirates have produced some extremely sophisticated fakes.  Check it out.


Comments

  1. Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 3:25AM  

    please next time you develop windows try a new invention, er compatabilty with existing software.

    Just got new laptop with vista hate it already. To many questions it asks. trouble with software running from 2004/05 games particularly. Overal my windows vista experience isnt a "WOW" its why dont nothing work properly thinking off formating hard drive to re-install XP

  2. Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 3:27AM  

    i think the piracy doesnt work as in chine i saw on the news lots of copies of vista. so overall its not good. shame really.

  3. Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 9:36AM  

    Look for patches on company game website.. so far I see more games run under Vista than XP. Heck even my Win98 games runs and also runs smoothly under Vista, without even using the compatibility feature. Now I can play Froger 3D! (no I will not)

    Also the idea of Vista goal was not big fancy half working features like under a MAC OS, but rather have a new core, improved security, add features that should have been there since the first OS ever made (eg: skip/retry button on tasks, volume control per application, performence monitoring system, and many many many more) and improve the overall features of the OS. An example, right now when you type a web page in the address bar of a folder, your default web-browser and doesn't force you to use IE. Also, while your computer startup all the startup applications, you can actually DO STUFF! Under XP, the start menu disappear if you try to access it, and if you try to open My computer, you basically see an unresponsive window, until all your startup applications are done loading. Moreover, when you start a big application from a folder, or load a big file, you can actually continue to use the folder. Under XP you have the wait until the Task is done.

    Vista has a lot of potential, but MS marketing aren't doing ass to push the OS. Do they know that Vista is out?  Right now I see Microsoft being a dead company. NOTHING happens, they can close their doors the next day, and no one will realize.

    What annoys me about Vista is not only mr. activation, which doesn't reduce piracy (look at China where you can only find perfectly crack copies of Vista with access to ALL features), just pisses off users. But also it has over 50 processes gathering private information, which Microsoft says "It's not used to identify you", but later says "Will be used against you at Microsoft will" (this nullifies first statement). I'm not upgrading to Vista, until Microsoft removes this shit, or clarifies exactly what they take. Why don't you talk about that, Nick?!

  4. Up1
    Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 10:15AM  

    I agree with markster!

    Windows Vista isn't a operating system for laptops. Why all this transparency stuff (eye-candy). Just take a look at Mac OS X, there's no bling-bling. Nah! OK, desktops may run Vista fast, but Vista on a laptop... Oh I feel sick when I just think about it; dedicated graphics memory. Even 1 GB of RAM or 2 GB isn't enough! XP works great with 256 MB.

    I really hope the next OS after Vista will be better.

    Windows Vienna, Seven or Blackcomb, whatever Microsoft will name it, I hope they will develope it better. Vista's icons is clearer and maybe nicer, but a PC is made to do REAL works, not be still and watch all the eye-candy things, bla bla... It's CRAP, REAL CRAP! THE WORST OS I EVER SEEN!

    And that UAC! Why click Ok Ok Ok when I am trying to install Firefox, VLC media player, Adobe Photoshop, ect.! People get tired - well I do! If I will buy Vista, I will turn off UAC, auto-indexing, auto-defrag, Defender and all that stuff. Replace IE with Firefox, WMP with VLC media player and so on...

    But I would never ever buy a crap OS like Vista.

    This is what I mean:

    Windows Vista - Windows Millennium 2

    hopefully...

    Windows Vienna, Seven, Blackcomb - Windows XP 2

    If not, I will buy a Mac or get Linux!

    LONG LIVE XP! :-D

    Regards,

    Lars

  5. Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 11:40AM  

    [quote]

    Vista on a laptop... Oh I feel sick when I just think about it; dedicated graphics memory. Even 1 GB of RAM or 2 GB isn't enough! XP works great with 256 MB.

    [/quote]

    No that's because Laptop manufactures doesn't put good hardware in it. Instead of putting a good graphic card like a Geforce8400M, no they put this ""video card"" call the Intel intergreated graphics, or some SiS S3 Pro video card. Which some of those models has difficulty drawing XP interface. But what do you expect for a 200$ Dell laptop. Next time, spend 2k for one, and Vista will run perfectly smoothly without draining more battery life (ok, maybe you'll have 10-20 min less). I lost 15min when I installed Vista RC2 on my laptop, compared to XP. And that is with Aero and everything turned on.

    For UAC, your supposed to DISABLE it, while you install everything. There is a check box (if I recall correctly) in the User control panel. Simply un-check it, and have fun. Just recheck it when you are done. (or leave it uncheck, but it's not recommended, as you reduce your computer from security risk done by human (sorry, like everyone, your not perfect, and accidents can occur)).

    If you think UAC is bad, look at Linux. You need to love the Terminal, as you will use it for about running/install/mounting/unmounting, well about anything you do under it, even under a xWindows interface like KDE or Gnome. Under Linux the highest account you can be on it is well in reality: "very limited". Ubuntu, did some hack on Linux to run you as "Limited but bellow XP or Vista limited account". That is one of the reason why Linux is so safe. Do you want Windows to be like that? I think not.

    Under Vista, "Administrator" is actually "Power User", and "Limited" is well still "Limited". No one can be Administrator. But to prevent people complaining about it, and say that Microsoft controls everything or wtv bashing comment someone can trough at it, they called it Administrator even thus it's not in reality.

    As for the OS animation and/or transparency, you can disable that. And you can have Windows Classic skin if you really wanted. No registry hack required. :)

    Also, under MacOS, you see a freaking movie when you do something, under Vista, you have to admit that it's a perfect balance. Maybe an option to be able to set the speed of the animations might be interesting, but it's still pretty good. For you, it good without animation, but for my parents, everytime they minimize a window they go "What?! What?! What just happened? Did I delete the folder?". As it's instant, they don't know what happened as:

    1- They are afraid of computers. Not in the sense that they are afraid to touch it, it's just that they never get how it works. Then don't get how millions of transistors makes a CPU that can calculate about everything that happens on the screen. Is it their fault? No! Of course I'm not saying ALL Adults, are target, but I mean people that comes from other places other then Canada, US or even UK, like my parents where technology moves very slowly. Right now it's like taken a today computer, go back in time where typewriters where used, and computer never exited, and give this new computer to a secretary. Just imagine her reaction. The jump is too big to be adapted. Maybe that is why concept cars never get released. Will we even replace the searing wheel with a joystick like on some concept cars or futuristic Sci-fi movies?!? I think not.

    2- They have a mentality that anything sophisticated must be fragile. Therefor, when something happens in a chock (like minimizing a window) they think they did something bad, like delete the folder, or closed it. It takes about  5-10sec for them to realize that the window just minimize and can be found on the task bar.  Animations like these, confirms the user that he minimize the window, and where it can found later one to access it. (as the animation goes the to the task bar)

    Fact: Before when my parents where surfing the internet, they used to close the HOLE web browser to then re-open it, to change web site. Yea that's pretty bad. And with tabs... oh god! What a mess! Well with a Firefox extension that makes makes an animation when you open/close/switch between web browser tabs, it well help A LOT, and now they use the tabs more. It still doesn't fix the problem of closing the hole web browser and re-open it to change web site, but it sure helps when they use tabs.

    As for XP RAM usage. XP NEED 2GB of RAM to run perfectly smoothly. I am a software develloper, and I have 2 machines, one with 2GB of RAM and the other 256MB. Both running XP SP2. Windows has serious difficulty running with 256MB. 512MB is good ONLY if you use IE and MSN. But then Windows 3.1 is good for you. If you want to use any office suite, disable windows to use your hdd as RAM, and run programs like Firefox, Visual C++, descent image editor, video DVD's and HD videos perfectly smoothly (meaning going at 30 frame per second without dropping 1 single frames during the hole movie), then a 2.0 Ghz CPU with 1GB of RAM is what you need. And if you play games, 2-3 GB is a MUST for XP.

    I, as a gamer, my system can run Vista (Beta 2, RC1 and RC2) perfectly smoothly, with hacked XP drivers to magically fit Vista and work. Is my system brand new? no. Did I pay 6k.. no...

    I only paid 2k without keyboard/mouse and monitor in Jan 2006. What's my system... Custom build computer: AMD Athlon X2 4400+ Socket 939,  2GB of RAM @ 400Mhz with a latency of 3-3-3-8 2T, motherboard: ASUS A8N32-SLI Nforce 4 32xSLI, Geforce 6600GT 128MB of RAM (going for a 8800 GTS soon :)), Western Digital 250GB SATA-II HDD, and Creative X-Fi Xtream Music. It's not a monster anymore. Yet Vista runs perfectly smoothly even under games with XP drivers fitted somehow fro Vista without one single BSOD. THAT'S STABLE!

  6. Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 12:11PM  

    Great hopefully the site will have more info and more examples of counterfiet software so people can be protected from buying bad software.  The pictures in the Gallery tend to focus on the full ot top of the line products e.g. Office Ultimate or Windows Ultimate, neglecting to some extent lesser versions.

    Im guessing thats because Pirates target the best version, and because Microsoft loses the most money when these versions are sold?

    Anyway theres nothing worse than buying expensive software only to find out you've been robbed and your OS or Office Software is going to pack in because of it.

    The Rouge Gallery is pretty shocking, however you can see how someone could be easily fooled with some of those examples of high quality counterfeit software.

    Hope everyone has a great 4th July, dont work to hard!

  7. Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 1:15PM  

    I've been running Vista on my three year old Dell laptop since RC1 and it runs as fast as XP ever did.  This is with only 1GB of memory. I think the reason is that when I ordered the laptop I wanted a gaming laptop (at the time) and got it with the ATI Mobulity 9700.  I Think with Vista all you need to get good performance if a good graphics card along with a gig of memory.  (My processor is only 1.6 Ghz)

    As far as not running old games and software from the XP days... if I would have said that I wanted to reinstall XP because my games from 2004 wouldnt work... it's like saying I want to take off XP so I can reinstall windows 95 since my Moto Racer from 1996 and my office 97 dosent work well under XP and XP sucks.... um yeah...right

  8. Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 2:37PM  

    Oh if anyone knows where to get a $200 Dell Laptop running Windows let me know that would be a good price :-)

  9. Up1
    Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 5:00PM  

    I see what you mean, Good_Bytes. And I know how to turn of and turn on functions.

    But I don't want to use a operating system which bombs me with stupid questions I have to click OK. "Do I have your access to install Firefox?"

    "Do I have your access to open the page where you can adjust the visual effects?"

    YES! Why would I NOT click if I want to adjust the f*cking visual effects?!

    That's terrible!

    If I get Vista, which I probably won't, this is first things I will do when I start the computer:

    - Turn off UAC

    - Turn off Windows Firewall and replace it with Sygate Firewall, ZoneAlarm Firewall or another firewall

    - Download avast! antivirus

    - Disable automatic defrag

    - Disable Indexer service

    - Disable Windows Defender and replace it with S&D, Ad-Aware

    - Replace WMP with VLC media player

    - Replace IE with Firefox

    Then do the rest...

    -----

    From a Swedish article:

    "... It is big differences between Windows XP and Windows Vista:

    Windows XP strives to have so mych free memory as it's possible.

    Windows Vista, on the other hand, strives to fill the RAM as much as it can!..."

  10. Posted on: July 04, 2007 at 8:35PM  

    Hey Guys,

    Why is it going to take till December or Janurary to release this? It looks like it should be ready in the next month or so?

    Molly

    Melbourne, AUSTRALIA

  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: sylvan learning center franchise opportunities on September 12, 2007 at 5:57PM

    sylvan learning center franchise opportunities

  2. Posted by: learn spanish free websites on September 12, 2007 at 5:57PM

    learn spanish free websites