Improvements in Updating

One of the things that I have been focused on for many years is the ability to update a Windows PC with the latest software to make the system run great and help keep it secure.  While automation has really always been my core dream, we had to start someplace, so back when we first launched Windows Update it was really just about having a single place to find the bits people need to keep their systems up to date.  But, once at the site they still had to do everything manually.

Windows XP Service Pack 2 was certainly an important milestone for Windows Update, primarily because we changed the recommended setting for the Automatic Updates functionality of Windows Update from the option that just downloaded the updates and then notified you that an update was available, to the option that automatically downloaded and installed the updates.  In addition, we created a new feature in system shutdown that allowed the system to install the latest updates as a part of the shutdown process.

These changes have had a dramatic increase on the number of people both using Windows Update but also using Automatic Updates.  For example, in the case of one of the security updates we released in October of 2003 (before Windows XP SP2), only about one-half of the systems that downloaded the update ever installed it.  Only about 9% of those installations were done as part of a scheduled update, the rest were installed manually (with user intervention).  In contrast, in September of 2006 (after Windows XP SP2) we had about three times the number of installations of one of our security updates.  What is interesting is that of those installs only 20% of them were done manually and 80% (!) were automatically installed through scheduled updates (34%) or at system shutdown (46%).  Certainly we helped people to be more protected from attacks.

When I help a friend or family member with their Windows PC, one of the first things I check is to make sure that their PC is up to date.  Now, with the widespread use of Automatic Updates, I usually find that they are.

While this was great progress, there were a few additional things we really wanted to get done in Windows Vista.  First, while Automatic Updates in Windows XP SP2 did a great job of getting critical security fixes onto your PC, there really was no way for you to automatically keep your PC up-to-date with the non-critical updates that are important to keep your PC current.  So for Windows Vista, you now have the ability to include recommended updates when downloading and installing updates.  While this is the recommended setting when you install Windows Vista, you have the choice to not take these updates, and of course you can change your mind later.

With Windows Vista, you also have the ability to choose Microsoft Update instead of Windows Update so that you can keep Microsoft products that use Microsoft Update current.  In addition, for Microsoft applications that use Microsoft Update (like Office 2007), we give you the opportunity to turn on Microsoft Update as part of the set-up process of the application.

Also for the first time, with Windows Vista, we are using Automatic Updates to help you get drivers that may be missing from your system.  While Windows Update has been used to distribute device drivers for some time, with Automatic Updates in Windows Vista, if you choose the recommended setting for Automatic Updates (download and install important and recommended updates), every time that the machine is scanned by Automatic Updates, it will look to see if there are any devices that either don’t have a device driver installed for them or for which a generic driver was used.  If a specific (non-generic) driver is now available, then it will be downloaded and automatically installed.  As is the case with Windows XP, if you were using a driver that was known to have problems for a lot of customers, when a better driver is available, Automatic Updates will download the newer driver and automatically replace it.

Since updating systems is such an important aspect of keeping PCs healthy, we have always made these services free to licensed users of Microsoft Windows.

At the end of the day this all about two things:  1) my vision for using automation to continuously increase the health and reliability of Windows, and 2) responding to customer feedback that indicated that Microsoft should provide even better and easier-to-use facilities that will keep systems up to date.  In both cases I know we have had positive impact on the customer experience.

jim


Comments

  1. Posted on: November 15, 2006 at 12:08PM  

    Hey newscientist2000:  Due to the interaction between ActiveX and IE, you do have to revalidate each time you initiate a WGA download.  There is a work-around for this, which is to keep one IE window open and do all your downloads in that window.  Using the work-around, you will only have to validate on the very first download.  All the downloads in that IE session will be covered by the first validation.

  2. Posted on: November 15, 2006 at 1:12PM  

    I have a question - what about the occurance of system reboots after you've updated? I remember back during the Windows Vista Beta 1 timeframe that Microsoft promised that there would be a dramatic change so that you would rarely need to restart Windows after updating.

    Is this still the case for the final version of Windows Vista?

  3. Posted on: November 15, 2006 at 4:47PM  

    Hey Kristan Kenney: I know that when I apply updates via WU, I rarely if ever am required to reboot.  This has been my experience using RC1, RC2 and RTM.

  4. Posted on: November 15, 2006 at 7:20PM  

    Windows Vista RC2 is excepcional, but have a big problens when ty to run some prograns and MMORPG games like Lineage 2 and others...I think that will be a god idea work more above this case, if windows vista pretend be a moste powerfull game plataform...

  5. Posted on: November 16, 2006 at 1:36PM  

    I am new to Vista updating. I need to know if I should purchase an update or full installation CD?  Is there just one type of installation CD that can perform an upgrade or full install?  Can you mention the product numbers to order.

    Finally, what do you recommend when insatlling Vista on 1 versus 100 PC's to be updated?

    Thank you, Rich

  6. Posted on: November 16, 2006 at 2:20PM  

    Hey Rich:  

    Whether you purchase the upgrade to Windows Vista or the FPP (fully-packaged product) will depend on your needs; there's a list of considerations and a helpful chart located at http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/upgradeinfo.mspx to get you started.

    For information on licensing numerous computers, I'd suggest you check out our Volume Licensing programs at http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/.

    Hope this helps!

  7. Posted on: November 16, 2006 at 8:20PM  

    i have a question, not suer if u can answer. I have Vista RC1 currently loaded on my pc. When the final version is available for purchase am I able to upgrade RC1 to the final retail version without losing my files which I have currently in Vista?

  8. Posted on: November 16, 2006 at 8:32PM  

    Hey zorbawolf:  you'll need to back-up your files before upgrading or re-installing Windows Vista from RC1 to the full product.  When you load the disc and the auto-exec begins for the first time, you'll either be presented with 1) the option to upgrade or 2) to perform a clean install; or, you'll only be able to do a clean install.  I'm afraid you'll need to wait until installation time to know the exact upgrade path(s) available to you.

  9. Posted on: November 16, 2006 at 10:06PM  

    Great Post & Good Luck.

    ------

    http://www.dl4all.com

  10. Posted on: November 17, 2006 at 11:14AM  

    Some suggestions:

    - Many drivers are often outdated such as NVIDIA ones.

    - Add ability to archive/keep/cache updates.

    - There is one MAJOR bug in the Windows hotfix installer (Update.exe). It begins to hang on slower PCs when the catalog files for the updates (located in the Catroot folder) are more than 200 or so or at the System Restore phase. Hope this is fixed in Vista or will be fixed by SP1.

    - PLEASE add a switch so that creation of a restore point can be optionally skipped when installing updates. When you reinstall Windows, it makes no sense to create a system restore point if you are applying previously released updates serially.

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition on November 14, 2006 at 11:25PM

    Did you know that 46% of all of Windows XP SP2's Automatic Updates are installed at system shutdown?