News: Revision to Windows Vista retail licensing terms

I’m very pleased to let you know you this morning (or afternoon, or evening, depending on where you are when you read this) that the Windows division has revised the retail license terms for Windows Vista in a significant way.  Namely, the terms regarding license-to-device assignment of the retail product (including Home Basic, Home Premium, Business and Ultimate) now read as follows: 

  • You may uninstall the software and install it on another device for your use.  You may not do so to share this license between devices.

You can find the newly-revised retail license terms here, as I’m sure you’ll want to read them for yourself.

Our intention behind the original terms was genuinely geared toward combating piracy; however, it’s become clear to us that those original terms were perceived as adversely affecting an important group of customers: PC and hardware enthusiasts.  You who comprise the enthusiast market are vital to us for several reasons, not least of all because of the support you’ve provided us throughout the development of Windows VistaWe respect the time and expense you go to in customizing, building and rebuilding your hardware and we heard you that the previous terms were seen as an impediment to that -- it’s for that reason we’ve made this change.  I hope that this change provides the flexibility you need, and gives you more reason to be excited about the upcoming retail release of our new operating system.


Comments

  1. max
    Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 4:20PM  

    Great! As Microsoft partner I'm happy. Now we can capitalize on enthusiastic power users to push Vista into companies!

  2. Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 4:43PM  

    Great news! Now do us Lexmark owners a favor and cook up a driver for our Lexmark 3in1s that will work in Vista.

  3. Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 4:45PM  

    Brilliant, brilliant move!

    Then again, I didn't expect anything less.

  4. Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 5:11PM  

    Thank you very much for taking the time to inform us of this change.  I was quite worried about and thinking of giving up Vista.  I will now most certainly get it.

  5. Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 5:25PM  

    And you are right Nick,I AM jealous. Any openings?

  6. Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 5:42PM  

    This is the sort of thing Microsoft needed to do to win back the hearts of the Enthusiast Community. Well played.

    (For the record, I felt that the previous version of the EULA was written with the phrase "stab the Enthusiast Community in the heart" instead of "win back the hearts of the Enthusiast Community", which is very easy for lawyers to confuse.) ;)

  7. Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 5:46PM  

    Good, I'm happy I can actually do my yearly hardware upgrades without having to fork out an additional $300-$400 just to keep my OS license current.

    I'm sure a heck not thanking you though. You should have never tried to pull a stunt like this in the first place. You've left us with a very bitter taste in our mouthes.

  8. Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 5:48PM  

    Okay  I have an idea for really pumping up the good buzz about Vista.  Randomly select Vista RC1 and other beta testers and give away a free copy of Vista!  Not all beta testers, but just some - maybe give away ten copies per day in the first month that Vista debuts - either in November or in January.  What do you think?   Hey, I can dream can't I?

    BTW, I'm currently running Vista RC1 on my home built PIV, my Mac Book Pro, and on my work PC  a Dell GX620.  With the exception of Vista running a tad too hot on the MacBook Pro, it seems to handle everything I have tried so far.  All systems have 1 gig of RAM (the MacBook has two gig), and high end video cards.  Love that Aero!

  9. Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 6:03PM  

    Better; much, much better.

    As PlanetAMD64_Guru so accurately said, this is *precisely* what Microsoft needs to do to re-engage with the likes of us.

    It's good to know you've listened to what we've said and though I also understand where mesostinky is coming from I will say well done. Perhaps in future releases you can consider EULA ramifications along with the actual technical/product testing during beta phases. People like us are probably a better audience to bounce ideas off than the lawyers.

    Anyway, once it's released I can feel an order for Vista coming on, now I've just got to decide which version. :)

  10. Posted on: November 02, 2006 at 6:19PM  

    Let's recap the whole situation for a moment.

    The XP (Home) EULA says:

    "You may move the Product to a different Workstation Computer.  After the transfer, you

    must completely remove the Product from the former Workstation Computer."

    The previous Vista EULA said:

    "reassign the [Windows Vista] license to another device one time." [1]

    In [1], Paul Thurrott argued that MS was not taking away any transfer rights/privileges in Vista. This is because those transfer privileges were already taken away in XP. Yes, apparently the XP EULA meant that you can only transfer *once*. He admits it was "vaguely worded". He backs all this up with an interview with "Microsoft general manager Shanen Boettcher". Shanen said that the clause was only intended for hardware failures. He said that "it's always been per device". The rest of that section explains that almost nobody would reach this restriction, therefore it is unimportant.

    Throughout he refers to some "online pundit" who is misguided, throwing myths around, etc. This is Ed Bott on ZDNet. He replied to this article [2] who says he's read well in the area and that "I've never heard this claim made". He links to five places on the MS international websites, all of which talk about the transfer. None of them suggest any more than the original XP EULA that the transfer can only happen once. i.e. They don't mention any such restriction at all.

    Paul Thurrott even posted somebody else's reply [3] to his article, but it hardly addressed the revisionism of his first article, only talking about how ridiculous this enthusiast thinks the restriction is.

    On the Vista Team Blog, the new license prompted lots of feedback, almost all negative and much of it angry. The team only said that they would "help us all make informed decisions" and "clarify" (paraphrases).

    Now we get a new license term replacing the one which caused the controversy:

    "You may uninstall the software and install it on another device for your use.  You may not do so to share this license between devices."

    Compare this to the XP version:

    "You may move the software to a different device.  After the transfer, you must completely remove the software from the former device." (I have replaced "Workstation Computer" with "device" and "Product" with "software").

    Notice the similarity? However, according to Paul Thurrott and Shanen Boettcher, the second version means you can only transfer *once*, whereas the first version (according to this blog) means you can transfer unlimited times. Can somebody explain where the difference is?

    [1] http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_licensing.asp

    [2] http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=158

    [3] http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_licensing_reply.asp

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: Donna's SecurityFlash on November 02, 2006 at 3:00PM

    From Windows Vista Team: Windows division has revised the retail license terms for Windows Vista in a

  2. Posted by: Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition on November 02, 2006 at 3:13PM

    Nick White from the Official Windows Vista Blog just posted some very interesting news . It appears that

  3. Posted by: TechBlog on November 02, 2006 at 3:48PM

    Spotted by the eagle-eyed Claus: Microsoft apparently has backed down on its Windows Vista license restriction that limited transfer of the operating system to a new machine only once. From the Window Vista Team Blog: I'm very pleased to let...

  4. Posted by: UFies.org on November 02, 2006 at 5:45PM

    Bitch I do, but I have to give credit where credit is due when I saw that the license terms...

  5. Posted by: Brad's Weblog on November 02, 2006 at 6:08PM
  6. Posted by: Windows Vista/Longhorn Blog on November 03, 2006 at 1:05AM

    MS Vista team just announce the licensing terms for Vista was changed, which allow you to move retail...

  7. Posted by: Le blog de LostInBrittany on November 03, 2006 at 2:58AM

    Il semblerait que ces derniers temps je parle pas mal de Microsoft et de leur nouveau Windows Vista, et que la plupart de mes billets sur le sujet sont trs critiques. Pas plus loin que hier, par exemple, je vous parlais encore de la gourmandise de...

  8. Posted by: deedee.brainstream.net on November 03, 2006 at 5:12AM
  9. Posted by: KAZ-TCS Ltd. Company Weblog on November 03, 2006 at 5:35AM

    From Vista Blog : I’m very pleased to let you know you this morning (or afternoon, or evening, depending

  10. Posted by: GottaBeMobile.com on November 03, 2006 at 7:24AM
  11. Posted by: Anjana's Arena on November 03, 2006 at 8:36AM

    Atlast the Vista licensing policy has been revised by Micrsoft today. This is really a great news!!!

  12. Posted by: Mike Taulty's Blog on November 03, 2006 at 10:14AM

    Good news on the Vista licensing front.

  13. Posted by: VMblog.com - Virtualization Information on November 03, 2006 at 2:29PM

    This could be great news as long as they follow through. The "virtualization" licensing aspect of Vista still bothers me, but I was equally concerned about Microsoft's "reinstallation" policy with Vista. Sounds like they might be listening to the grumbling

  14. Posted by: Tech Talk Blog on November 05, 2006 at 5:10PM

    One of the Thought Bubble post responses sent me on a bit of a crusade to find out more about the licensing...

  15. Posted by: ハマる生活 on November 05, 2006 at 10:52PM

    この記事は 「WindowsXPの次のWindowsOS、Vistaでは自作パソコンユーザにとって、大変不利な、使いにくいライセンスになるらしいこと」 についての情報を集約する為の記事である。記事は適宜改訂される。

  16. Posted by: Views on Vista on December 05, 2006 at 4:02AM

    Yesterday, we presented the first of five cinema events featuring Exchange 2007, Office 2007 and Vista.

  17. Posted by: La masa, el ladrillo, la bota, el bocadillo... on December 10, 2006 at 3:29PM

    Leía hace unos días en el blog de Rafael Ontivero sus airadas quejas contra los terminos de licencia

  18. Posted by: Lifehacker on December 11, 2006 at 8:08PM

    Just got back from a weekend visit to the Microsoft campus up in Redmond, Washington where I got the chance to hear about Windows Vista and other new MS creations, like the Xbox 360 and Zune music player. There...

  19. Posted by: E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva" on January 12, 2007 at 10:36PM

    Dear Mr. Ballmer: I've emailed you before.. I've blogged to you before... I've seen you in person before.

  20. Posted by: Ms Windows On Macbook ♦ Apple MacBook and MacBook Pro News on July 27, 2008 at 5:45PM