Avoid the Apple Tax – Cash in on the value of Windows

With the ailing global economy, I am looking at ways I get better value for my money. One way I can do this if I need to replace a computer is by avoiding the “Apple Tax.”

Microsoft sponsored a new whitepaper (PDF) from Roger Kay of Endpoint Technologies Associates which takes a look at the tax from a tech analyst’s viewpoint. His paper shows the “Apple Tax” is the combination of what people pay up front when purchasing a Mac and what people pay over the life of their computer – the hidden tax.

Roger looked into both aspects in his whitepaper, and has discovered some interesting findings around the “hidden tax” of owning a Mac – using the scenario of a hypothetical family of 4 and their costs over a five year period. Knowing that Tax Day is just around the corner here in the US (April 15), I decided to have a little fun with his findings by building a mock up tax form using Roger’s numbers that show the whopping difference this family would get purchasing Windows PCs over Macs: $3,367.

1040combo_form

I know taxes are calculated annually but I thought it would be more interesting to look in terms of total savings Roger outlined in choosing 2 Windows PCs over 2 Macs in that 5 year period.

So what could you do with that $3,367 savings by avoiding the Apple Tax?

If you want to get some exercise you could get bikes for the whole family, and still have money left over (All via Performance Bicycles)!

  • Schwinn Sid Coasting Bike ($499.99)
  • Schwinn Nancy Ladies Coasting Bike ($499.99)
  • Performance Girls 24” Kids Mountain Bike ($299.99)
  • 2008 Mongoose Amasa Comp Mountain Bike ($679.99)
  • 4 helmets: 2 Bell Ukon Sport Helmets @ $34.99, 1 Giro Women’s Kaya Helmet @ $39.99, and 1 Ascent Cruise Youth Helmet @ $29.99)

Take the family out for a night at the movies - 117 times (4 tickets @ $7.18 = $28.72)!

Make your home green, and save even more money!

It is human nature to focus on the up-front price. The coverage around our Laptop Hunters ads jumps right to that (“PCs are cheaper”). The harder thing to capture is the overall cost and the VALUE. Roger’s paper does a great job illustrating this. Cost is getting something cheaper. Value is a function of getting more of what you want, regardless of what you spend. And you’re a lot more likely to find that with a Windows PC.

Shoppers rarely do a lifetime cost of ownership calculation for a new computer (even though that’s the real cost and makes the PC advantage even greater) but they intrinsically calculate the value for a new computer. That’s what we see in the market every day and what we see in the choices made by Lauren and Giampaolo as they each selected a PC that met their own unique criteria (features and budget). They wanted the right value for them. And that’s the beauty of Windows PCs – the diversity of choice and options that exist so that people can find what’s right for their own needs, not someone else’s. You’re never forced to buy more than you need or give up features you want like Blu-ray, Mobile Broadband, Firewire, and more. And, Windows PCs offer this across a broadest range of price points and performance from low-end netbook PCs to high-end gaming rigs.

But let’s limit ourselves to the narrow scenario where Apple does have offerings. We get questions about this all the time so we asked Roger to take a look at the comparison chart that we’ve used before to outline features, specs and price points across Macs and PCs. Part of his conclusion is, “Holding the price constant and examining specifications only serves to exaggerate the better deals on the Windows side.”

new_laptop_chart

Note: The chart splits the Mac and PC laptops in to 3 categories: Value for basic models, Mainstream for average models, and Performance for high end models to illustrate options where Apple has machines. Of course the full spectrum of PC laptops is much broader.

What do you think about the concept of value? And what would you do with a $3,367 “Apple Tax Return”? Sound off in comments. In a few weeks I’ll showcase what people say they would do with their “Apple Tax Return” in a follow-up blog post.

UPDATED 4/13

Digg This

Comments

  1. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 12:16AM  

    Oh and then there is the fact that a Mac is more likely to get stolen as they're more expensive.

    This is an old article, but it provides some backing to my statement

    www.independent.co.uk/.../hitech-thieves-take-the-shine-off-apple-mac-1420604.html

    If I was a psychology major I might get some mock ups of a PC and a Mac with a lose cable...and leave them on a table with a hidden camera and time how long they last in a high theft area.

    I bet a Windows 7 PC would be stolen faster than an XP PC too, oh if only I had the money to test my theories.  The latter would be an interesting Viral Marketing Campaign.

    "In tests at MVP summit.. the Windows 7 PC was stolen on average 5 minutes faster than the same PC running Windows XP! "

  2. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 12:33AM  

    Brandon LeBlanc,

    1. You don't need to buy a family pack for MobileMe with just two computers, even if you want more than one email address.

    2. the Family Pack is $88.05 (www.amazon.com/.../ref=sr_1_2).

  3. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 12:42AM  

    Damnit I just wrote a whole comment then lost it.  Anyway the main point was that the biggest glitch on my Mac is MS Office glitching in Spaces.

  4. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 12:43AM  

    Oh, I forgot to mention. If you want a Hotmail account on a Mac, get one. If you want to use SkyDrive on a Mac, use it.

    If you want to use MobileMe on Windows, use it.

    It makes no sense that you have to only use things in the Apple ecosystem with a mac and only things in the Microsoft ecosystem on a PC.

    I thought this was about choice, after all...

  5. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 1:51AM  

    MobileMe is entirely optional. Windows users can sign up for MobileMe too, and some may want to because of their iPhones and iPod Touches, so should we count that ridiculous $475 "tax" under PC's too?

    And maybe it's just me, but I don't think Hotmail supports push mail at this stage of life. And last I checked, I do know Mac users with hotmail accounts too...and as far as I know, they sure as heck didn't pay for that.

    Although truth be told, I'm starting to see a really, and I mean REALLY, big shift of both Mac and "PC" userbase towards online services offered by Google. Yup, not Apple or Microsoft, but Google.

    And maybe that's it. I'm pretty sure that Microsoft is still a software company by majority, so why are you all trying to help OEM's sell PC's? I think Microsoft should bring Seinfeld back to the marketing team - at least people get a chuckle out of those commercials and it actually seems more "Microsoft" than those new laptop-hunting commercials.

    First impression when I see those new series of commercials, I see Best Buy and I see HP. I don't see Microsoft, I don't see Vista, and I don't see Office, Visual Studio, ExpressionWeb, Live! products, or (most likely the biggest hardware cash cow these days?) the X-box 360.

    I know most of these ads may have some retaliatory natures to them, but lately even Apple's dropped those and focused on "usability" for their new ads. You don't see them making commercials bashing Windows Mobile for their iPhones - they focus on app diversity and user friendliness. Their previous Macbook Air ads focuses on how thin and light it is, not how they've got OSX out of the box and how much Vista pales in comparison to it.

    Why can't Microsoft do the same? Why can't Microsoft make commercials that illustrate the cross-platform compatibility of Office Suites? Why can't Microsoft showcase the security and stability of Vista or the upcoming 7? Heck, if MS wants to retaliate, why not emphasize the point that out of 100 computers, 80-90 of them run Windows and only 2-5 runs OSX? It won't be a difficult one to make, just go out and spend 100k and random buy up computers. Here, I'll write you a punchline for free:

    "95% of computers run and prefer Microsoft Windows and great products like Office. Corporations, small businesses, schools and home users continue to depend on the versatility and stability of Microsoft. There's a reason why we're everywhere."

  6. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 3:02AM  

    The tone of the report gives it away, not a fair comparison.

    - "Already Windows 7 is showing itself to be a far more worthy competitor for Mac OS X than Vista was." That says something about Vista (which is a real product and apparently not a worthy competitor, so we have that settled). Windows 7 is vapourware until it is released. It will be better than Vista, I expect (as it is hardly possible to get worse press than Vista got), but it won't become a miracle just like that. How often has Microsoft done this? Anybody remember Cairo, Longhorn, Trusted Computing, OS/2 3.0 (which was renamed to NT), and all the stuff that was promised for Vista?

    - Why the need to buy iLife again after three years?

    - Where is the anti-virus you need on the Windows side

    - Most PC's are not used that long, Macs in my experience are used longer than PCs. Prepare to buy a new PC every 3-4 years, a new Mac every 5 years.

    - Apart from the fact that Vista is not generally liked, why pitch a 'home' version against OS X (which arguably has only one version: ultimate)

    - If I move form PC to Mac I have to re-invest (e.g. in MS Office for Mac). But the same is true if I go from Mac to PC. So, this is effectively telling the 90% of users: there are switching costs. That is something different than an Apple Tax. If I go from Mac to PC there are also (huge) switching cost.

    - The desktop is 2CPU (Apple ) versus 1CPU (HP)?

    - Why would I buy the optional Mobile Me?

    - What about memory type? Some DDR2 others DDR3? Huge difference.

    - What about pixels? Yes I can get a very clunky low resolution laptop that is far cheaper than an Apple.

    - Etc. Others may dissect this one by one.

    Apple is not perfect. I for one have not been thrilled by build quality over the last years.

    These attacks from Microsoft show desperation and fear more than any real argument.

  7. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 3:21AM  

    Nobody excepts you Windows Makers to tell the truth...

    www.appleinsider.com/.../microsoft_pays_for_inaccurate_apple_tax_study.html

    Why are you lying??!!

  8. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 3:56AM  

    Hi Brandon...

    I didnt know that Microsoft was a PC retailer... Apple is both a PC retailer and an OS manufacturer...So please compare what is comparable...

    Oh you forgot to mention one thing... Windows Vista is running far better on Mac (with Bootcamp) than on a pc with equivalent configuration.

    And... One more thing what about comparing the user experience between OSX and Vista in a next post ?

    Keep me posted!

  9. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 5:18AM  

    @LTMP: I did miss OS X's speech commands functions.

    To me, after having used Vista, minimal SR = speech-to-text dictation.

  10. Posted on: April 10, 2009 at 6:15AM  

    As others are again saying - Mobile Me Family pack can be bought cheaper elsewhere - what about the other points made such as the $300 extra on blu-ray drive when you can actually get it on the Mac for the same price as a PC one.

    Next the facts that most Windows users have to shell out yearly subscriptions for anti-virus software, something over looked (for obvious reasons) in the tax. Yes of course Mac's can also have viruses, but right now I don't know one Mac user who has needed or will ever buy anti-virus software. So please add that on too ;o)

    Next. Well I have a hotmail account, I can get a SkyDrive account - both on my Mac's too - so why does that family HAVE to have mobile me? Also Windows users can have mobile me too - but again its optional so should the PC tax also have the extra "$750" you have mentioned?

    From my experience with Mac's they have lasted a lot longer than any PC I have ever had - My old Powerbook from 5 years ago runs the latest OS X fine - something that can't be said of even a top-range PC Laptop and Vista - so does this mean there should be another additional purchase of a PC laptop added around the 4 year mark to the tax study?

    Next what are the quality of the screens in these comparison PC's - they won't be as good as the Mac ones no doubt, and for myself that makes a difference. The graphics cards were also dire - and the comparison of a 1CPU desktop machine against a 2CPU Mac wasn't really a fair comparison either was it?

    When you have the writer for the piece (Roger Kay) stating on CNet yesterday that Microsoft provided him with even more stuff to pad to the article, I think that really sums up why this is one really bad (well another really bad) PR campaign.

    If you want to the best advert you could do right now, it would be to forget about HP, Sony etc in your TV ads and show how to install Windows onto a Macbook - as sadly for those companies they have proven to be the best performing laptop versions of Vista there is.

    Maybe your ads should be lambasting how badly the companies like them are producing Vista onto their Laptops etc rather than producing uneducated, basically lying facts and making yourselves look really really stupid.

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: Microsoft revisits 'Apple tax' ahead of Tax Day | All about Microsoft | ZDNet.com on April 09, 2009 at 11:38AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft revisits 'Apple tax' ahead of Tax Day | All about Microsoft | ZDNet.com

  2. Posted by: Posts about Blu-ray as of April 9, 2009 » DVD Newsroom on April 09, 2009 at 12:01PM

    Pingback from  Posts about Blu-ray as of April 9, 2009 » DVD Newsroom

  3. Posted by: Shadow Productions » Apple Tax: The Proof on April 09, 2009 at 12:13PM

    Pingback from  Shadow Productions » Apple Tax: The Proof

  4. Posted by: Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Supossably on April 09, 2009 at 1:10PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Supossably

  5. Posted by: Apple News on April 09, 2009 at 1:35PM

    Microsoft's attack on Apple is coming from many fronts. It all started with Steve Ballmer's statement

  6. Posted by: YourBlogOnline | Best knowladge database » Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows on April 09, 2009 at 1:52PM

    Pingback from  YourBlogOnline | Best knowladge database » Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows

  7. Posted by: Microsoft Spreading more FUD « Alpha’s Place on April 09, 2009 at 3:28PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Spreading more FUD «  Alpha’s Place

  8. Posted by: Avoid the “Apple Tax” - Cash in on the value of Windows 7 x 24 News World on April 09, 2009 at 3:43PM

    Pingback from  Avoid the “Apple Tax” - Cash in on the value of Windows 7 x 24 News World

  9. Posted by: Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax « Apple Rumor Blog on April 09, 2009 at 5:37PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax « Apple Rumor Blog

  10. Posted by: Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Apple News on April 09, 2009 at 5:48PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Apple News

  11. Posted by: Latest Laptop Hunters Ad Shows Off PCs with Blu-ray & Remote | Bob Caswell on April 09, 2009 at 8:37PM

    Pingback from  Latest Laptop Hunters Ad Shows Off PCs with Blu-ray & Remote | Bob Caswell

  12. Posted by: Microsoft sponsored study indicates an "Apple Tax" on April 09, 2009 at 8:52PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsored study indicates an "Apple Tax"

  13. Posted by: Microsoft Does the Math on the “Apple Tax.” Badly. | Technologizer on April 09, 2009 at 10:02PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Does the Math on the “Apple Tax.” Badly. | Technologizer

  14. Posted by: Tech News, Resources from Blogosphere - 10 April 09(3) | Best Webhosting on April 09, 2009 at 10:28PM

    Pingback from  Tech News, Resources from Blogosphere - 10 April 09(3) | Best Webhosting

  15. Posted by: Avoid the Apple Tax - Cash in on the value of Windows (Brandon LeBlanc/The Windows Blog) | Apple Secrets on April 10, 2009 at 1:52AM

    Pingback from  Avoid the Apple Tax - Cash in on the value of Windows (Brandon LeBlanc/The Windows Blog) | Apple Secrets

  16. Posted by: Pathetic or Funny You Decide. Microsoft Pays for Fudged Report | Mactropolis.com - Your Friendly Global Mac Community on April 10, 2009 at 3:06AM

    Pingback from  Pathetic or Funny You Decide. Microsoft Pays for Fudged Report | Mactropolis.com - Your Friendly Global Mac Community

  17. Posted by: Interactiondesign Blog » Blog Archiv » website of the day on April 10, 2009 at 3:09AM

    Pingback from  Interactiondesign Blog  » Blog Archiv   » website of the day

  18. Posted by: Avoid the Apple Tax; Microsoft whitepaper on April 10, 2009 at 3:38AM

    Pingback from  Avoid the Apple Tax; Microsoft whitepaper

  19. Posted by: Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows|Join Our Story!|AngNetwork Blog on April 10, 2009 at 8:52AM

    Pingback from  Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows|Join Our Story!|AngNetwork Blog

  20. Posted by: Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron on April 10, 2009 at 9:36AM

    Pingback from  Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron

  21. Posted by: Agora a Microsoft quer usar a infame “Apple tax” a seu favor | BLOG.MACMAGAZINE on April 10, 2009 at 9:51AM

    Pingback from  Agora a Microsoft quer usar a infame “Apple tax” a seu favor | BLOG.MACMAGAZINE

  22. Posted by: Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron « Mokujin WebBlog on April 10, 2009 at 9:53AM

    Pingback from  Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron «  Mokujin WebBlog

  23. Posted by: Why is Windows targeting Mac? « CyberTech Rambler on April 10, 2009 at 10:45AM

    Pingback from  Why is Windows targeting Mac? « CyberTech Rambler

  24. Posted by: Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron | FocuSoft Tech Blog on April 10, 2009 at 11:14AM

    Pingback from  Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron | FocuSoft Tech Blog

  25. Posted by: Microsoft's Apple Tax: One Apple User Calls it a DEAL! ??? GenuineChris.com on April 10, 2009 at 11:53AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft's Apple Tax: One Apple User Calls it a DEAL! ??? GenuineChris.com

  26. Posted by: Trade Jim News » Behind Microsoft’s “Apple tax” gambit on April 10, 2009 at 1:55PM

    Pingback from  Trade Jim News    » Behind Microsoft’s “Apple tax” gambit

  27. Posted by: Friday Designer Resource Links | Web Design on April 10, 2009 at 3:08PM

    Pingback from  Friday Designer Resource Links | Web Design

  28. Posted by: Examining the Windows Tax - Evaluating the Long Term Costs of Windows vs. Mac | Leo Newball, Jr. on April 10, 2009 at 5:56PM

    Pingback from  Examining the Windows Tax - Evaluating the Long Term Costs of Windows vs. Mac  |  Leo Newball, Jr.

  29. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 10, 2009 at 7:04PM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  30. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 1:27AM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  31. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 7:54AM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  32. Posted by: Microsoft toma al consumidor por idiota – Disruptive Sketchbook on April 11, 2009 at 10:42AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft toma al consumidor por idiota – Disruptive Sketchbook

  33. Posted by: John at myITforum.com on April 11, 2009 at 12:02PM

    Interesting post on CNNMoney. Microsoft (MSFT) raised the stakes in its anti-Apple (AAPL) PR offensive

  34. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 2:01PM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  35. Posted by: Tonight on Mythbusters: The mythical Apple Tax at Respect Sakura on April 11, 2009 at 4:11PM

    Pingback from  Tonight on Mythbusters: The mythical Apple Tax  at  Respect Sakura

  36. Posted by: UnderForge of Lack » Blog Archive » Microsoft propagandize “No Apple Tax” on April 11, 2009 at 6:28PM

    Pingback from  UnderForge of Lack  » Blog Archive   » Microsoft propagandize “No Apple Tax”

  37. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 8:28PM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  38. Posted by: 平成鸚鵡籠中記 on April 11, 2009 at 9:29PM

    MicrosoftのApple税キャンペーンですが、情報をただ垂れ流す(しかも内容もかなり刈り込んでいる)ようなITmedia Newsに対して、マイコミジャーナルは疑義を加えていました。曲がりなりにも紙媒体で歴史がある毎日コミュニケーションズの運営するサイトなので、それも当然ですが。最近はAppleへのSwitch体験記事なども掲載するようになったCNETは、Microsoftがスポンサーになって米調査会社Endpoint Technologies Associatesの社長でアナリストのロジャー

  39. Posted by: » give us this day our daily kool-aid i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness on April 12, 2009 at 1:49AM

    Pingback from  » give us this day our daily kool-aid i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness

  40. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 12, 2009 at 2:57AM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News