Avoid the Apple Tax – Cash in on the value of Windows

With the ailing global economy, I am looking at ways I get better value for my money. One way I can do this if I need to replace a computer is by avoiding the “Apple Tax.”

Microsoft sponsored a new whitepaper (PDF) from Roger Kay of Endpoint Technologies Associates which takes a look at the tax from a tech analyst’s viewpoint. His paper shows the “Apple Tax” is the combination of what people pay up front when purchasing a Mac and what people pay over the life of their computer – the hidden tax.

Roger looked into both aspects in his whitepaper, and has discovered some interesting findings around the “hidden tax” of owning a Mac – using the scenario of a hypothetical family of 4 and their costs over a five year period. Knowing that Tax Day is just around the corner here in the US (April 15), I decided to have a little fun with his findings by building a mock up tax form using Roger’s numbers that show the whopping difference this family would get purchasing Windows PCs over Macs: $3,367.

1040combo_form

I know taxes are calculated annually but I thought it would be more interesting to look in terms of total savings Roger outlined in choosing 2 Windows PCs over 2 Macs in that 5 year period.

So what could you do with that $3,367 savings by avoiding the Apple Tax?

If you want to get some exercise you could get bikes for the whole family, and still have money left over (All via Performance Bicycles)!

  • Schwinn Sid Coasting Bike ($499.99)
  • Schwinn Nancy Ladies Coasting Bike ($499.99)
  • Performance Girls 24” Kids Mountain Bike ($299.99)
  • 2008 Mongoose Amasa Comp Mountain Bike ($679.99)
  • 4 helmets: 2 Bell Ukon Sport Helmets @ $34.99, 1 Giro Women’s Kaya Helmet @ $39.99, and 1 Ascent Cruise Youth Helmet @ $29.99)

Take the family out for a night at the movies - 117 times (4 tickets @ $7.18 = $28.72)!

Make your home green, and save even more money!

It is human nature to focus on the up-front price. The coverage around our Laptop Hunters ads jumps right to that (“PCs are cheaper”). The harder thing to capture is the overall cost and the VALUE. Roger’s paper does a great job illustrating this. Cost is getting something cheaper. Value is a function of getting more of what you want, regardless of what you spend. And you’re a lot more likely to find that with a Windows PC.

Shoppers rarely do a lifetime cost of ownership calculation for a new computer (even though that’s the real cost and makes the PC advantage even greater) but they intrinsically calculate the value for a new computer. That’s what we see in the market every day and what we see in the choices made by Lauren and Giampaolo as they each selected a PC that met their own unique criteria (features and budget). They wanted the right value for them. And that’s the beauty of Windows PCs – the diversity of choice and options that exist so that people can find what’s right for their own needs, not someone else’s. You’re never forced to buy more than you need or give up features you want like Blu-ray, Mobile Broadband, Firewire, and more. And, Windows PCs offer this across a broadest range of price points and performance from low-end netbook PCs to high-end gaming rigs.

But let’s limit ourselves to the narrow scenario where Apple does have offerings. We get questions about this all the time so we asked Roger to take a look at the comparison chart that we’ve used before to outline features, specs and price points across Macs and PCs. Part of his conclusion is, “Holding the price constant and examining specifications only serves to exaggerate the better deals on the Windows side.”

new_laptop_chart

Note: The chart splits the Mac and PC laptops in to 3 categories: Value for basic models, Mainstream for average models, and Performance for high end models to illustrate options where Apple has machines. Of course the full spectrum of PC laptops is much broader.

What do you think about the concept of value? And what would you do with a $3,367 “Apple Tax Return”? Sound off in comments. In a few weeks I’ll showcase what people say they would do with their “Apple Tax Return” in a follow-up blog post.

UPDATED 4/13

Digg This

Comments

  1. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 9:17PM  

    Regarding value, Vista's built-in speech recognition capabilities are always overlooked. This is amazing technology that OS X fans would have to pay at least $100 for just to get minimal SR functions, compared to Vista.

    I think some folks' emphasis on BSODs tends toward FUD - they haven't been a problem for me since the Win98 days, about 10 years ago (back when I was always screwing around with my setup). I still mess around with my systems, but BSODs haven't been part of my experience with XP and Vista. There has been no "time tax" with XP and Vista.

    As for e-mail, websurfing, and printing? There is no way anyone should justify a Mac purchase just for that - it'd be a ludicrous waste of money. I bought a Compaq c500 laptop running Vista Home Basic, maybe 3 years ago, on sale at Best Buy for $300. That's about the max I'd ever pay just to e-mail, websurf, and print letters (I'd try for less, actually).

  2. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 9:38PM  

    And, just to add, that c500 is still going strong, no problems (I did bump up the memory by 512MB, to 1G, when I bought it) - I watched Masters coverage on it today (Amen Corner). Smooth sailing. . .

  3. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 9:55PM  

    @Anguis

    Regarding value, Vista's built-in speech recognition capabilities are always overlooked. This is amazing technology that OS X fans would have to pay at least $100 for just to get minimal SR functions, compared to Vista.

    OS X has had speech recognition for at least three years, never been a charge for it.

  4. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 10:19PM  

    Windows truth & consequences:

    rixstep.com/.../20090326,00.shtml

  5. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 10:22PM  

    Thank you everyone for your comments! Keep them coming. A lot of great feedback.

  6. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 10:28PM  

    WOW, Apple must have Microsoft running scared to have commissioned someone to make up this obvious distortion.  Why not compare Windows Vista and Mac OSX side by side, feature by feature?  Why not make a fair comparison with like services (Windows Live), software (Microsoft Office) and supporting hardware (current hardware & Linksys router)?  Taking the high road would have made it the comparison accurate and made the point.  

  7. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 10:55PM  

    byron_hinson and others, regarding MobileMe - according to Apple's website, a MobileMe Family Pack (4 family members which is used in the whitepaper for the Bancroft Family) costs $149 a year.

    www.apple.com/.../pricing

    That totals $745 for 5 years reflected in the above Apple Tax Form within the blog post.

    Seeing as you can get free email accounts from Windows Live Hotmail and SkyDrive accounts for each family member also free with 25GB of storage - not sure the Family Pack from MobileMe is much of a deal. For 4 members - SkyDrive offers a total of 100GB of free online storage.

  8. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 11:02PM  

    HD Boy, we got a nice new "modern" OS coming very soon. It's called Windows 7 :-)

  9. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 11:41PM  

    Well the general point is a given PCs are better value for money, if you invest in a Mac your basically starting down a road of expensive peripherals and add on software.

    With a PC most retail software and hardware will just work, and over time these get cheaper due to the mass market that is PC software and hardware. With a Mac although support is getting better every year you are more likely to have to pay top dollar for everything you buy, be it a printer or the latest Mac games.

    That said the argument is reduced to drivel when you state that people need Mac software e.g. Office 2008 MAC, and there is no PC equivalent in the PC cost column, can't your analyst use Excel?

    It looks like your either encouraging people to not use Office 2007 PC, or saying that it has no cost! ...Unless you picked up Microsoft Equipt at Circuit City during a liquidation sale and made money buying Office 2007 for your PC, last time I checked Office 2007 Student edition on average cost at least the same on the PC as the Mac edition at regular retail.

    A better approach would be to include the price of Office 2007 Ultimate which really has no comparison on the MAC and include extra software equivalent to Groove, Publisher, InfoPath and OneNote....

    Then you wouldn't look quite so biased, but the price difference would still be in your favor.

    The PC definitely is better value, look at the vast quantity of quality software available for free or cheap at download.com or giveawayoftheday.com and the advantages add up quickly.

    Good argument, good point, bad execution.

  10. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 11:57PM  

    ... I realize that the analysis is based on re-acquisition of software such as Microsoft Office for the Mac, but that argument is pretty poor given that when Windows 7 comes out most people will be running Windows 7 - 64bit edition which means that they will most likely want to be running Office 2007 or a higher version, and will need to pay for it.

    I know I want the next version of Office, as soon as it comes out!

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: Microsoft revisits 'Apple tax' ahead of Tax Day | All about Microsoft | ZDNet.com on April 09, 2009 at 11:38AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft revisits 'Apple tax' ahead of Tax Day | All about Microsoft | ZDNet.com

  2. Posted by: Posts about Blu-ray as of April 9, 2009 » DVD Newsroom on April 09, 2009 at 12:01PM

    Pingback from  Posts about Blu-ray as of April 9, 2009 » DVD Newsroom

  3. Posted by: Shadow Productions » Apple Tax: The Proof on April 09, 2009 at 12:13PM

    Pingback from  Shadow Productions » Apple Tax: The Proof

  4. Posted by: Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Supossably on April 09, 2009 at 1:10PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Supossably

  5. Posted by: Apple News on April 09, 2009 at 1:35PM

    Microsoft's attack on Apple is coming from many fronts. It all started with Steve Ballmer's statement

  6. Posted by: YourBlogOnline | Best knowladge database » Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows on April 09, 2009 at 1:52PM

    Pingback from  YourBlogOnline | Best knowladge database » Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows

  7. Posted by: Microsoft Spreading more FUD « Alpha’s Place on April 09, 2009 at 3:28PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Spreading more FUD «  Alpha’s Place

  8. Posted by: Avoid the “Apple Tax” - Cash in on the value of Windows 7 x 24 News World on April 09, 2009 at 3:43PM

    Pingback from  Avoid the “Apple Tax” - Cash in on the value of Windows 7 x 24 News World

  9. Posted by: Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax « Apple Rumor Blog on April 09, 2009 at 5:37PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax « Apple Rumor Blog

  10. Posted by: Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Apple News on April 09, 2009 at 5:48PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Apple News

  11. Posted by: Latest Laptop Hunters Ad Shows Off PCs with Blu-ray & Remote | Bob Caswell on April 09, 2009 at 8:37PM

    Pingback from  Latest Laptop Hunters Ad Shows Off PCs with Blu-ray & Remote | Bob Caswell

  12. Posted by: Microsoft sponsored study indicates an "Apple Tax" on April 09, 2009 at 8:52PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsored study indicates an "Apple Tax"

  13. Posted by: Microsoft Does the Math on the “Apple Tax.” Badly. | Technologizer on April 09, 2009 at 10:02PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Does the Math on the “Apple Tax.” Badly. | Technologizer

  14. Posted by: Tech News, Resources from Blogosphere - 10 April 09(3) | Best Webhosting on April 09, 2009 at 10:28PM

    Pingback from  Tech News, Resources from Blogosphere - 10 April 09(3) | Best Webhosting

  15. Posted by: Avoid the Apple Tax - Cash in on the value of Windows (Brandon LeBlanc/The Windows Blog) | Apple Secrets on April 10, 2009 at 1:52AM

    Pingback from  Avoid the Apple Tax - Cash in on the value of Windows (Brandon LeBlanc/The Windows Blog) | Apple Secrets

  16. Posted by: Pathetic or Funny You Decide. Microsoft Pays for Fudged Report | Mactropolis.com - Your Friendly Global Mac Community on April 10, 2009 at 3:06AM

    Pingback from  Pathetic or Funny You Decide. Microsoft Pays for Fudged Report | Mactropolis.com - Your Friendly Global Mac Community

  17. Posted by: Interactiondesign Blog » Blog Archiv » website of the day on April 10, 2009 at 3:09AM

    Pingback from  Interactiondesign Blog  » Blog Archiv   » website of the day

  18. Posted by: Avoid the Apple Tax; Microsoft whitepaper on April 10, 2009 at 3:38AM

    Pingback from  Avoid the Apple Tax; Microsoft whitepaper

  19. Posted by: Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows|Join Our Story!|AngNetwork Blog on April 10, 2009 at 8:52AM

    Pingback from  Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows|Join Our Story!|AngNetwork Blog

  20. Posted by: Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron on April 10, 2009 at 9:36AM

    Pingback from  Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron

  21. Posted by: Agora a Microsoft quer usar a infame “Apple tax” a seu favor | BLOG.MACMAGAZINE on April 10, 2009 at 9:51AM

    Pingback from  Agora a Microsoft quer usar a infame “Apple tax” a seu favor | BLOG.MACMAGAZINE

  22. Posted by: Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron « Mokujin WebBlog on April 10, 2009 at 9:53AM

    Pingback from  Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron «  Mokujin WebBlog

  23. Posted by: Why is Windows targeting Mac? « CyberTech Rambler on April 10, 2009 at 10:45AM

    Pingback from  Why is Windows targeting Mac? « CyberTech Rambler

  24. Posted by: Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron | FocuSoft Tech Blog on April 10, 2009 at 11:14AM

    Pingback from  Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron | FocuSoft Tech Blog

  25. Posted by: Microsoft's Apple Tax: One Apple User Calls it a DEAL! ??? GenuineChris.com on April 10, 2009 at 11:53AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft's Apple Tax: One Apple User Calls it a DEAL! ??? GenuineChris.com

  26. Posted by: Trade Jim News » Behind Microsoft’s “Apple tax” gambit on April 10, 2009 at 1:55PM

    Pingback from  Trade Jim News    » Behind Microsoft’s “Apple tax” gambit

  27. Posted by: Friday Designer Resource Links | Web Design on April 10, 2009 at 3:08PM

    Pingback from  Friday Designer Resource Links | Web Design

  28. Posted by: Examining the Windows Tax - Evaluating the Long Term Costs of Windows vs. Mac | Leo Newball, Jr. on April 10, 2009 at 5:56PM

    Pingback from  Examining the Windows Tax - Evaluating the Long Term Costs of Windows vs. Mac  |  Leo Newball, Jr.

  29. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 10, 2009 at 7:04PM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  30. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 1:27AM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  31. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 7:54AM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  32. Posted by: Microsoft toma al consumidor por idiota – Disruptive Sketchbook on April 11, 2009 at 10:42AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft toma al consumidor por idiota – Disruptive Sketchbook

  33. Posted by: John at myITforum.com on April 11, 2009 at 12:02PM

    Interesting post on CNNMoney. Microsoft (MSFT) raised the stakes in its anti-Apple (AAPL) PR offensive

  34. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 2:01PM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  35. Posted by: Tonight on Mythbusters: The mythical Apple Tax at Respect Sakura on April 11, 2009 at 4:11PM

    Pingback from  Tonight on Mythbusters: The mythical Apple Tax  at  Respect Sakura

  36. Posted by: UnderForge of Lack » Blog Archive » Microsoft propagandize “No Apple Tax” on April 11, 2009 at 6:28PM

    Pingback from  UnderForge of Lack  » Blog Archive   » Microsoft propagandize “No Apple Tax”

  37. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 8:28PM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  38. Posted by: 平成鸚鵡籠中記 on April 11, 2009 at 9:29PM

    MicrosoftのApple税キャンペーンですが、情報をただ垂れ流す(しかも内容もかなり刈り込んでいる)ようなITmedia Newsに対して、マイコミジャーナルは疑義を加えていました。曲がりなりにも紙媒体で歴史がある毎日コミュニケーションズの運営するサイトなので、それも当然ですが。最近はAppleへのSwitch体験記事なども掲載するようになったCNETは、Microsoftがスポンサーになって米調査会社Endpoint Technologies Associatesの社長でアナリストのロジャー

  39. Posted by: » give us this day our daily kool-aid i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness on April 12, 2009 at 1:49AM

    Pingback from  » give us this day our daily kool-aid i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness

  40. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 12, 2009 at 2:57AM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News