Avoid the Apple Tax – Cash in on the value of Windows

With the ailing global economy, I am looking at ways I get better value for my money. One way I can do this if I need to replace a computer is by avoiding the “Apple Tax.”

Microsoft sponsored a new whitepaper (PDF) from Roger Kay of Endpoint Technologies Associates which takes a look at the tax from a tech analyst’s viewpoint. His paper shows the “Apple Tax” is the combination of what people pay up front when purchasing a Mac and what people pay over the life of their computer – the hidden tax.

Roger looked into both aspects in his whitepaper, and has discovered some interesting findings around the “hidden tax” of owning a Mac – using the scenario of a hypothetical family of 4 and their costs over a five year period. Knowing that Tax Day is just around the corner here in the US (April 15), I decided to have a little fun with his findings by building a mock up tax form using Roger’s numbers that show the whopping difference this family would get purchasing Windows PCs over Macs: $3,367.

1040combo_form

I know taxes are calculated annually but I thought it would be more interesting to look in terms of total savings Roger outlined in choosing 2 Windows PCs over 2 Macs in that 5 year period.

So what could you do with that $3,367 savings by avoiding the Apple Tax?

If you want to get some exercise you could get bikes for the whole family, and still have money left over (All via Performance Bicycles)!

  • Schwinn Sid Coasting Bike ($499.99)
  • Schwinn Nancy Ladies Coasting Bike ($499.99)
  • Performance Girls 24” Kids Mountain Bike ($299.99)
  • 2008 Mongoose Amasa Comp Mountain Bike ($679.99)
  • 4 helmets: 2 Bell Ukon Sport Helmets @ $34.99, 1 Giro Women’s Kaya Helmet @ $39.99, and 1 Ascent Cruise Youth Helmet @ $29.99)

Take the family out for a night at the movies - 117 times (4 tickets @ $7.18 = $28.72)!

Make your home green, and save even more money!

It is human nature to focus on the up-front price. The coverage around our Laptop Hunters ads jumps right to that (“PCs are cheaper”). The harder thing to capture is the overall cost and the VALUE. Roger’s paper does a great job illustrating this. Cost is getting something cheaper. Value is a function of getting more of what you want, regardless of what you spend. And you’re a lot more likely to find that with a Windows PC.

Shoppers rarely do a lifetime cost of ownership calculation for a new computer (even though that’s the real cost and makes the PC advantage even greater) but they intrinsically calculate the value for a new computer. That’s what we see in the market every day and what we see in the choices made by Lauren and Giampaolo as they each selected a PC that met their own unique criteria (features and budget). They wanted the right value for them. And that’s the beauty of Windows PCs – the diversity of choice and options that exist so that people can find what’s right for their own needs, not someone else’s. You’re never forced to buy more than you need or give up features you want like Blu-ray, Mobile Broadband, Firewire, and more. And, Windows PCs offer this across a broadest range of price points and performance from low-end netbook PCs to high-end gaming rigs.

But let’s limit ourselves to the narrow scenario where Apple does have offerings. We get questions about this all the time so we asked Roger to take a look at the comparison chart that we’ve used before to outline features, specs and price points across Macs and PCs. Part of his conclusion is, “Holding the price constant and examining specifications only serves to exaggerate the better deals on the Windows side.”

new_laptop_chart

Note: The chart splits the Mac and PC laptops in to 3 categories: Value for basic models, Mainstream for average models, and Performance for high end models to illustrate options where Apple has machines. Of course the full spectrum of PC laptops is much broader.

What do you think about the concept of value? And what would you do with a $3,367 “Apple Tax Return”? Sound off in comments. In a few weeks I’ll showcase what people say they would do with their “Apple Tax Return” in a follow-up blog post.

UPDATED 4/13

Digg This

Comments

  1. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 11:21AM  

    i recently bought a macbook on the strength of how fantastic the iphone is and wanting to dabble with iphone app dev.

    however i have to say, whilst i adore my iphone, i can't say the same of the macbook. whilst it looks gorgeous and the build is super, osx i have to say is not doing it for me. i still find windows to be a superior operating system for getting stuff done quickly and i prefer the wealth of options i get at the click of a mouse.

    looking at windows 7, although i can now see some elements are borrowing on some macx elements, i think the combined strength of some apple ideas and the power of windows will make windows 7 a real must have.

    windows ftw.

  2. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 11:38AM  

    Testing writing a comment due to reports of people having issues leaving comments.

  3. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 11:45AM  

    There are issues with your analysis Brandon.

    Firstly, you make the apple users buy MS Office 2008, Quicken, and $70 of "Other Software".

    Last time I checked, MS Office was not included in Windows, so that is a cost encurred by Windows users too, unless you are encouraging Windows users to use Open Office of course, an option which is equally avalable in Mac OS X.

    You also forget that, since you need more RAM and CPU power to run Vista, the OS on all the PC's mentioned, and that you also need an Anti-Virus in Windows as well, the Macbooks power is needed less.

    You are also including 3 times as many services and support packages, all optional, for the mac compared to the Dell. This only covers the Dell inspiron and not the HP, whereas you probably included Services and Support for both macs.

    As I said previously, you will need an Anti-Virus for Windows, and most families like the one you are using as an example will choose to pay for an Anti-Virus product rather than use a free one, so that cost should be included under "support".

    The other issue is compatability with work environments, what systems they currently have, and how long the systems will last for the family.

    I know people who would still be using PPC Macs if they ran Mac OS X, whereas I know people who have had to spend money buying a new Windows PC every 2/3 years.

    And if you are wanting to make this a fair comparison amongst all the available choices, why weren't Syetm76 of Dell Ubuntu systems included in the comparison?

    This is a badly executed comparison IMO, and I hope to see something further thought out in the future, to the standard I expect from you Brandon.

  4. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 11:48AM  

    And just when I thought Microsoft was easing off on the FUD...

    If you'd have bothered to check Apple's web site, you'd know that the base MacBook actually has 2gB of RAM in it, expandable to 4gB quite easily.

    The screen is smaller, but the resolution is the same on the MacBook, so the screen has a higher number of pixels per inch. The image is therefore sharper, and the machine is also easier to lug around.

    I'm intrigued by the 'wireless broadband' row at the bottom - I don't know about you, but I prefer to buy my service separate from my device. I wouldn't buy a service which offered me a complimentary computer with a contract internet package. I don't buy a computer because it comes with an ISP contract.

    You've also failed to take into account the fact that Apple's service and build quality is also generally a lot better. I still have an iMac on my desk, which is working excellently after eight years and several rather abusive owners (myself included). The only part that I've had to replace is the hard drive, which actually came from an (even older) Power Mac. I also prefer the idea of a system which works out-of-the-box, with minimal configuration, after around ten minutes, than a Packard Bell or Toshiba machine which I have to spend days removing the pre-installed crapware from.

    My advice, Brandon, is to play to Windows's strengths next time, not the opponents' (dubious) weaknesses. Remember that Macs _are_ PCs, as are computers running Linux, and are perfectly capable of running Windows alongside OS X. There's no reason you can't play nicely together.

  5. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 11:55AM  

    Imaginary scenario based on real life experience:

    "What's that? your scanner caused a blue screen? Too bad, buy YAS (yet-another-scanner for the OS du jour). Internal modem killing your printer? Sheesh, that stuff is old, buy another modem, probably a printer too. Tuner card going wonky? Yeah better add that to your list. Listen we whip out our OS well in advance so you can know what to buy [sucker]. Where do you want to go today?

  6. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 11:57AM  

    Jonathan Rothwell, thanks for the feedback and comment! I appreciate it!

    I do believe the post does play into one of Windows' major stengths: choice.

    In regards to mobile broadband, you can buy a Windows PC today that has built in mobile broadband capability for several major wireless carriers. And Windows 7 will be also sporting enhancements to take advantage of mobile broadband:

    windowsteamblog.com/.../partners-to-support-native-windows-7-mobile-broadband.aspx

    Thanks!

  7. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 12:14PM  

    Brandon, there are more Linux netbooks with integrated Mobile Broadband than there are Windows.

    There are more Linux apps that can fulfill your needs, more Linux Desktop Environments/Window Managers to make your desktop exactly that: Yours.

    You're arguing choice? So can others.

    I don't argue that Apples have less choice OOTB (out of the box), Windows isn't exactly the "freedom of choice" choice, now is it? If Windows crashes on my hardware, and it does the same on a re-install, I need to wait for MSFT to fix it, instead of having myself, and friends, and kernel hackers all available to ask for help in fixing it.

  8. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 12:27PM  

    I have Dell XPS 1530 and i love it.

    I have a desktop build BY ME :D and monitor Dell 2707 ultrasharp

    now i change my gpu (8800 GTX with GTX 275 Nvidia)

    Hey mac user  you can?? NO!

    BYE

  9. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 12:48PM  

    Can't say I agree with all of your points - it's way too simplistic a comparison of value. My experience is that what the Mac brings to the table is a higher level of service (you can get help at the Mac store, the same is not usually true at the local electronics store where you bought your PC).

    First, you're comparing machines with different capabilities: theYou'd also need to take into account the difference in software to make a fair comparison, and that typically ends up being about the same for either Mac or Windows.

    As an example, I have both a MacBook Pro, and a PC running Windows. Neither one came with XP Pro, so the difference in price for software for Windows, was simply the cost of Parallels ($49).  For a lot of the software, it's either open source, or the cost is the same.

    There are differences in the warranty, and hardware that you don't account for either.

    And for complete costs, you'd probably need to take into account things like boot time - my Mac boots from complete shutdown in seconds (well under a minute), and from sleep nearly instantly, and has never blue screened. I used to have time to get breakfast every morning when booting up my PC (can you say 30 minutes a day for a full work year? the Mac just paid for itself with productive time).

    My Mac is lighter, faster, better supported, and it does Windows - what else could I ask for ?

  10. Posted on: April 09, 2009 at 1:04PM  

    I would buy a Macbook Pro and eat the Apple Tax.

    I hate my Dell so incredibly bad. I bought it my freshman year in College (Fall 2007) and since then I have had the screen replaced 3 times, motherboard replaced one time, graphics chip one time, memory one time.

    In addition to that the paint is wearing off, some plastic parts are cracking...etc.

    On top of all that, the 8600M GT they use in here was fited with DDR2, not the GDDR3 that the Macbook pros used. So this laptop consumes more power and is slower than what I would have gotten with Apple.

    Granted Apple have their own problems. They share the fate of the Nvidia chip issue, but I would think they are still a higher quality that what I got. They get LED backlights in their 15 inch models (that was unrivaled when I bought my laptop) and their body is constructed of aluminum and not plastic.

    If I had the money (which sadly I do not, tuition, books....) I would buy another laptop, and one of my choices would definitely be a Macbook Pro.

    Microsoft has to do something to push their OEMs to create better pieces of hardware. I hate mine, and I know many others who hate their Dells, and HPs. I can no longer blame anyone for wanting a Mac.

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: Microsoft revisits 'Apple tax' ahead of Tax Day | All about Microsoft | ZDNet.com on April 09, 2009 at 11:38AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft revisits 'Apple tax' ahead of Tax Day | All about Microsoft | ZDNet.com

  2. Posted by: Posts about Blu-ray as of April 9, 2009 » DVD Newsroom on April 09, 2009 at 12:01PM

    Pingback from  Posts about Blu-ray as of April 9, 2009 » DVD Newsroom

  3. Posted by: Shadow Productions » Apple Tax: The Proof on April 09, 2009 at 12:13PM

    Pingback from  Shadow Productions » Apple Tax: The Proof

  4. Posted by: Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Supossably on April 09, 2009 at 1:10PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Supossably

  5. Posted by: Apple News on April 09, 2009 at 1:35PM

    Microsoft's attack on Apple is coming from many fronts. It all started with Steve Ballmer's statement

  6. Posted by: YourBlogOnline | Best knowladge database » Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows on April 09, 2009 at 1:52PM

    Pingback from  YourBlogOnline | Best knowladge database » Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows

  7. Posted by: Microsoft Spreading more FUD « Alpha’s Place on April 09, 2009 at 3:28PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Spreading more FUD «  Alpha’s Place

  8. Posted by: Avoid the “Apple Tax” - Cash in on the value of Windows 7 x 24 News World on April 09, 2009 at 3:43PM

    Pingback from  Avoid the “Apple Tax” - Cash in on the value of Windows 7 x 24 News World

  9. Posted by: Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax « Apple Rumor Blog on April 09, 2009 at 5:37PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax « Apple Rumor Blog

  10. Posted by: Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Apple News on April 09, 2009 at 5:48PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsors study that emphasizes a hidden Apple Tax | Apple News

  11. Posted by: Latest Laptop Hunters Ad Shows Off PCs with Blu-ray & Remote | Bob Caswell on April 09, 2009 at 8:37PM

    Pingback from  Latest Laptop Hunters Ad Shows Off PCs with Blu-ray & Remote | Bob Caswell

  12. Posted by: Microsoft sponsored study indicates an "Apple Tax" on April 09, 2009 at 8:52PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft sponsored study indicates an "Apple Tax"

  13. Posted by: Microsoft Does the Math on the “Apple Tax.” Badly. | Technologizer on April 09, 2009 at 10:02PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Does the Math on the “Apple Tax.” Badly. | Technologizer

  14. Posted by: Tech News, Resources from Blogosphere - 10 April 09(3) | Best Webhosting on April 09, 2009 at 10:28PM

    Pingback from  Tech News, Resources from Blogosphere - 10 April 09(3) | Best Webhosting

  15. Posted by: Avoid the Apple Tax - Cash in on the value of Windows (Brandon LeBlanc/The Windows Blog) | Apple Secrets on April 10, 2009 at 1:52AM

    Pingback from  Avoid the Apple Tax - Cash in on the value of Windows (Brandon LeBlanc/The Windows Blog) | Apple Secrets

  16. Posted by: Pathetic or Funny You Decide. Microsoft Pays for Fudged Report | Mactropolis.com - Your Friendly Global Mac Community on April 10, 2009 at 3:06AM

    Pingback from  Pathetic or Funny You Decide. Microsoft Pays for Fudged Report | Mactropolis.com - Your Friendly Global Mac Community

  17. Posted by: Interactiondesign Blog » Blog Archiv » website of the day on April 10, 2009 at 3:09AM

    Pingback from  Interactiondesign Blog  » Blog Archiv   » website of the day

  18. Posted by: Avoid the Apple Tax; Microsoft whitepaper on April 10, 2009 at 3:38AM

    Pingback from  Avoid the Apple Tax; Microsoft whitepaper

  19. Posted by: Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows|Join Our Story!|AngNetwork Blog on April 10, 2009 at 8:52AM

    Pingback from  Avoid the Apple Tax ??? Cash in on the value of Windows|Join Our Story!|AngNetwork Blog

  20. Posted by: Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron on April 10, 2009 at 9:36AM

    Pingback from  Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron

  21. Posted by: Agora a Microsoft quer usar a infame “Apple tax” a seu favor | BLOG.MACMAGAZINE on April 10, 2009 at 9:51AM

    Pingback from  Agora a Microsoft quer usar a infame “Apple tax” a seu favor | BLOG.MACMAGAZINE

  22. Posted by: Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron « Mokujin WebBlog on April 10, 2009 at 9:53AM

    Pingback from  Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron «  Mokujin WebBlog

  23. Posted by: Why is Windows targeting Mac? « CyberTech Rambler on April 10, 2009 at 10:45AM

    Pingback from  Why is Windows targeting Mac? « CyberTech Rambler

  24. Posted by: Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron | FocuSoft Tech Blog on April 10, 2009 at 11:14AM

    Pingback from  Mac are expensive if you shop like a moron | FocuSoft Tech Blog

  25. Posted by: Microsoft's Apple Tax: One Apple User Calls it a DEAL! ??? GenuineChris.com on April 10, 2009 at 11:53AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft's Apple Tax: One Apple User Calls it a DEAL! ??? GenuineChris.com

  26. Posted by: Trade Jim News » Behind Microsoft’s “Apple tax” gambit on April 10, 2009 at 1:55PM

    Pingback from  Trade Jim News    » Behind Microsoft’s “Apple tax” gambit

  27. Posted by: Friday Designer Resource Links | Web Design on April 10, 2009 at 3:08PM

    Pingback from  Friday Designer Resource Links | Web Design

  28. Posted by: Examining the Windows Tax - Evaluating the Long Term Costs of Windows vs. Mac | Leo Newball, Jr. on April 10, 2009 at 5:56PM

    Pingback from  Examining the Windows Tax - Evaluating the Long Term Costs of Windows vs. Mac  |  Leo Newball, Jr.

  29. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 10, 2009 at 7:04PM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  30. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 1:27AM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  31. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 7:54AM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  32. Posted by: Microsoft toma al consumidor por idiota – Disruptive Sketchbook on April 11, 2009 at 10:42AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft toma al consumidor por idiota – Disruptive Sketchbook

  33. Posted by: John at myITforum.com on April 11, 2009 at 12:02PM

    Interesting post on CNNMoney. Microsoft (MSFT) raised the stakes in its anti-Apple (AAPL) PR offensive

  34. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 2:01PM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  35. Posted by: Tonight on Mythbusters: The mythical Apple Tax at Respect Sakura on April 11, 2009 at 4:11PM

    Pingback from  Tonight on Mythbusters: The mythical Apple Tax  at  Respect Sakura

  36. Posted by: UnderForge of Lack » Blog Archive » Microsoft propagandize “No Apple Tax” on April 11, 2009 at 6:28PM

    Pingback from  UnderForge of Lack  » Blog Archive   » Microsoft propagandize “No Apple Tax”

  37. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 11, 2009 at 8:28PM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News

  38. Posted by: 平成鸚鵡籠中記 on April 11, 2009 at 9:29PM

    MicrosoftのApple税キャンペーンですが、情報をただ垂れ流す(しかも内容もかなり刈り込んでいる)ようなITmedia Newsに対して、マイコミジャーナルは疑義を加えていました。曲がりなりにも紙媒体で歴史がある毎日コミュニケーションズの運営するサイトなので、それも当然ですが。最近はAppleへのSwitch体験記事なども掲載するようになったCNETは、Microsoftがスポンサーになって米調査会社Endpoint Technologies Associatesの社長でアナリストのロジャー

  39. Posted by: » give us this day our daily kool-aid i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness on April 12, 2009 at 1:49AM

    Pingback from  » give us this day our daily kool-aid i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness

  40. Posted by: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News on April 12, 2009 at 2:57AM

    Pingback from  Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 | Apple News