IE8 Gets You Where You Want To Go, Quickly

As any browser vendor will quickly point out, accurately measuring the performance of a browser is extremely complex. On the surface, testing performance seems quite easy… visit a few sites with one browser and then again with a different browser, and simply time how long it took to load the page.

In reality, it’s much more complex than that.

Many things need to be taken into account when comparing the page load performance of different browsers. For example, due to the constantly changing nature of the Internet it is not easy to tell if the exact same content was delivered to each browser for each test. ISP’s, routers, and cable modems often cache their content, meaning that the page being loaded isn’t always coming all the way from the web server. The amount of network traffic can easily change between tests. All of these things (and more) can dramatically effect page load times.

Unfortunately, tools to accurately benchmark browser page load times don’t exist. All of the existing browser benchmarking tools available today are either narrow in their scope (SunSpider, Celtic Kane), inaccurate (iBench), or don’t consider important factors such as network latency, network congestion, and caching.

In the absence of effective benchmarking tools the Internet Explorer Team created a real world test which took the above mentioned factors into consideration and created a level playing field for all browsers tested. The results when comparing Internet Explorer 8 page load times to Firefox and Chrome were captured on video:


IE8 Performance

The performance video visually compares page load times between IE8, FF, and Chrome. Of the top 25 most popular sites in the world, IE8 wins 48% of the time, Chrome wins 38% 36% of the time, and FF only wins 16% of the time. Of course, they didn’t cherry pick the sites they tested. They chose the top 25 sites as reported by ComScore in December 2008. 

We encourage (and expect) people to run their own tests to measure page load times and for the browser industry at large to create a test that can accurately measure page load times – as seen by the user – across browsers. To assist people in running their own tests the Internet Explorer Team has also created a whitepaper which describes techniques that can be used to contend with some of the complex issues mentioned above.

For more information on Internet Explorer 8, visit www.microsoft.com/ie8.

UPDATED 6:16pm Pacific Time: Corrected percentage numbers to accurately reflect data from whitepaper.

Digg This

Comments

  1. Posted on: March 12, 2009 at 6:29PM  

    48% (IE) + 38% (GC) + 16% (Fx) = 102% - Math fail.

    I think that Chrome is 36%. ;-)

  2. Posted on: March 12, 2009 at 6:41PM  

    adcworks, as the blog post explains above... "due to the constantly changing nature of the Internet it is not easy to tell if the exact same content was delivered to each browser for each test. ISP’s, routers, and cable modems often cache their content, meaning that the page being loaded isn’t always coming all the way from the web server. The amount of network traffic can easily change between tests. All of these things (and more) can dramatically effect page load times."

  3. Posted on: March 12, 2009 at 7:14PM  

    Just for the test to be more thorough, I would like to see more browsers (Safari, Opera) and websites tested.

    Personally I use IE just because it's allways with Windows, I'm used to it, and I like its features. I sometimes do use FF or Safari to view websites that don't work well in IE (the developers use code that breaks in IE and have a "no IE" support policy, which is rather stupid of them not to include compatability, but whatever)

  4. Posted on: March 12, 2009 at 8:14PM  

    Helito, thanks for pointing that out. Blog post has been updated with the correct data from the whitepaper.

    StophVista, I'd be interesting in which sites have a "no IE" support policy that you visit.

  5. Posted on: March 12, 2009 at 11:46PM  

    The funniest part was that Firefox runs microsoft.com faster then IE8 (according to the video if I'm seeing correctly).

    There are more factors, but I hope IE8 is fast enough. I also hope that the UI is changeable enough. But there is tough competition out there (Firefox, Chrome), and worse then that, competition that isn't tough (Opera) that is trying to use the law to harm IE development.

  6. Posted on: March 13, 2009 at 2:43AM  

    I believe the tests since Microsoft explains how it was done and the explaination behind real-world vs synthetic tests. But for JavaScript intensive sites and Rich Internet Applications genre, IE8 certainly lags behind. MS already has a JITted and fast JS engine in CoreCLR/Managed JScript. Why not use it as native code in IE9?

  7. Posted on: March 13, 2009 at 4:01AM  

    @matt leblanc

    you can use the tracert command to see how many hops your  ip layer is taking to get to a certain site no? it takes me 12 hops and 163ms accumulated to get to digg.com and this is fairly consistent doing it each minute for 5 minutes. i don't think network config is really getting in the way all that much - it's certainly a relevant point but when the tracert is the same for IE8 and FF and Chrome, I suspect the percentages change.

  8. Posted on: March 13, 2009 at 10:29AM  

    That's not all.  When I use IE, I found that hackers and malware can infect my system a full 95% faster than when I use other browsers.  Go Speed Racer, go.

  9. Posted on: March 14, 2009 at 6:00PM  

    adcworks, it takes me 7 hops when I do a tracrt command from where I am. Yet when I visit my parents and do the same command, its 14 hops. You, as you've said get 12 hops. So as we said in the above blog post - the changing nature of the web has many variables.

  10. Posted on: March 15, 2009 at 9:23AM  

    I don't think people are loyal to Firefox just because of load times. There are so many add-ons that make your internet experience much better, and it is less resouce intensive. I, for one, am not going to rely on a test that Internet Explorer team constructed to make Firefox and Chrome look bad. That is not how you get more users. You don't bash other products. What you do is make your product better. I admit that IE8 is much better than IE7, I still prefer Firefox. I used IE8 and told myself that I would keep an open mind and try it for a full month and make a decision. I used it exclusively for a month and still went back to Firefox. It opens faster and loads pages faster and I can personalize it more. Plus, it uses less RAM and processor spikes are lower in Firefox.

  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Trackbacks

  1. Posted by: IE8 Gets You Where You Want To Go, Quickly on March 12, 2009 at 2:31PM

    Pingback from  IE8 Gets You Where You Want To Go, Quickly

  2. Posted by: Microsoft: IE8 ?? mais r??pido que o Firefox e Chrome ?? Guia do PC on March 12, 2009 at 7:14PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft: IE8 ?? mais r??pido que o Firefox e Chrome ?? Guia do PC

  3. Posted by: Asuka's Blog on March 12, 2009 at 10:28PM

    今天在网上看到了微软公布了一个IE8和其他2款浏览器:Firefox和Google Chrome的速度对比的 白皮书 和 视频 ,感叹于IE8的高效和稳定。 然后结合之前Smallfrogs的 《IE8

  4. Posted by: ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? » Blog Archive » ???????????? ????????????????????? on March 13, 2009 at 1:12AM

    Pingback from  ???????? ???? ???????? ????????  » Blog Archive   » ???????????? ?????????????????????

  5. Posted by: Microsoft Releases Browser Benchmarking Results - IE 48% Times Better Than FireFox and Chrome! || Technology Nerd on March 13, 2009 at 2:13AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft Releases Browser Benchmarking Results - IE 48% Times Better Than FireFox and Chrome! || Technology Nerd

  6. Posted by: Microsoft performance video: Visually compares page load times between IE8, FF, and Chrome on March 13, 2009 at 3:31AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft performance video: Visually compares page load times between IE8, FF, and Chrome

  7. Posted by: Microsoft performance video: Visually compares page load times between IE8, FF, and Chrome on March 13, 2009 at 3:31AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft performance video: Visually compares page load times between IE8, FF, and Chrome

  8. Posted by: Microsoft performance video: Visually compares page load times between IE8, FF, and Chrome | WORDPRESS EXTENSIONS-PLUGINS-THEMES-TEMPLATES on March 13, 2009 at 3:54AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft performance video: Visually compares page load times between IE8, FF, and Chrome | WORDPRESS EXTENSIONS-PLUGINS-THEMES-TEMPLATES

  9. Posted by: IE8 Internet Explorer 8 3???20??? ???????????? ??? | SE99???.jp on March 13, 2009 at 5:07AM

    Pingback from  IE8 Internet Explorer 8  3???20??? ???????????? ??? | SE99???.jp

  10. Posted by: Microsoft: IE8 ist schneller als Firefox und Chrome - Software | News | ZDNet.de on March 13, 2009 at 8:58AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft: IE8 ist schneller als Firefox und Chrome - Software | News | ZDNet.de

  11. Posted by: IE8 Gets You bWhere/b You Want To Go, Quickly - Windows Experience b…/b » GOSSIPGET.COM on March 13, 2009 at 10:57AM

    Pingback from  IE8 Gets You bWhere/b You Want To Go, Quickly - Windows Experience b…/b » GOSSIPGET.COM

  12. Posted by: [????????????]??????IE 8???????????? « ??????IT???????????????IT????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? on March 13, 2009 at 2:33PM

    Pingback from  [????????????]??????IE 8???????????? «  ??????IT???????????????IT?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

  13. Posted by: IE8 is fine when it comes to speed « Alpha’s Place on March 13, 2009 at 6:07PM

    Pingback from  IE8 is fine when it comes to speed « Alpha’s Place

  14. Posted by: Microsoft: IE8 é mais rápido que o Firefox e Chrome » Cyber Web X on March 15, 2009 at 10:27AM

    Pingback from  Microsoft: IE8 é mais rápido que o Firefox e Chrome » Cyber Web X

  15. Posted by: Microsoft: IE8 is speedy too! | SolSie.com on March 15, 2009 at 7:22PM

    Pingback from  Microsoft: IE8 is speedy too! | SolSie.com

  16. Posted by: Nigel Parker's Outside Line on March 16, 2009 at 10:37PM

    Back in November I blogged about “ Customising IE8 To Drive Users to Your Website ”. Despite the final

  17. Posted by: Windows Experience Blog on March 19, 2009 at 11:32AM

    Today on Day 2 of MIX09 , Internet Explorer General Manager Dean Hachamovitch during his keynote this

  18. Posted by: Final Release of Internet Explorer 8 Now Available | Windows Seven 7 on March 19, 2009 at 11:39AM

    Pingback from  Final Release of Internet Explorer 8 Now Available | Windows Seven 7

  19. Posted by: Final Release of Internet Explorer 8 Now Available on March 19, 2009 at 12:36PM

    Pingback from  Final Release of Internet Explorer 8 Now Available

  20. Posted by: The things that are better left unspoken on March 22, 2009 at 8:41AM

    Microsoft has released Windows Internet Explorer 8.0 to the web last Thursday. Besides improved reliability,

  21. Posted by: Internet Explorer 8.0 klaar voor gebruik on March 22, 2009 at 4:33PM

    Pingback from  Internet Explorer 8.0 klaar voor gebruik

  22. Posted by: Off with iE6’s head, no more internet explorer 6 | Web Design on March 23, 2009 at 9:55AM

    Pingback from  Off with iE6’s head, no more internet explorer 6 | Web Design

  23. Posted by: Internet Explorer 8 helps you save time with Accelerators | Windows Seven 7 on June 30, 2009 at 2:03PM

    Pingback from  Internet Explorer 8 helps you save time with Accelerators | Windows Seven 7

  24. Posted by: Internet Explorer 8 helps you save time with Accelerators on June 30, 2009 at 2:31PM

    Pingback from  Internet Explorer 8 helps you save time with Accelerators

  25. Posted by: ISN | Help 4 Small Biz on July 02, 2009 at 4:18PM

    There’s been a great deal of more talk lately about browser performance. You may have seen some previous discussion about page load performance as you saw here in a video and whitepaper in March. Page load ensures that you get to where you want to go

  26. Posted by: Internet Explorer 8 helps you save time with Accelerators | Futurecat - Michael Karek on July 13, 2009 at 8:35AM

    Pingback from  Internet Explorer 8 helps you save time with Accelerators | Futurecat - Michael Karek